Sheriff: S.C. inmate with 10 cellphone violations planned killing |

Sheriff: S.C. inmate with 10 cellphone violations planned killing

Associated Press
This undated photo provided by the South Carolina Department of Corrections shows James Peterson. Laurens County Sheriff Don Reynolds says that Peterson, an inmate serving a murder sentence in prison, orchestrated the revenge killing of a woman from behind bars using contraband cellphones. (South Carolina Department of Corrections via AP)

COLUMBIA, S.C. — A South Carolina inmate serving a murder sentence who was also convicted of running a drug ring from behind bars on contraband cellphones orchestrated the killing of a woman from his cell last month, a sheriff said Friday.

Michelle Dodge, 27, was kidnapped and shot in the back of the head last month by seven people taking orders from inmate James Peterson, Laurens County Sheriff Don Reynolds said.

Peterson is serving 30 years in state prison for killing a man in 2005 during a drug deal in Cherokee County. After he finishes that sentence, Peterson is set to serve 27½ years in federal prison for the cellphone drug ring he ran with four fellow inmates that was worth more than $500,000, according to court records. And now he faces 30 years to life in prison if convicted of murder in Dodge’s death.

“This hit was orchestrated out of there by an induvial with nothing to lose,” Reynolds said at a Friday news conference. “What does he have to lose to reach out and get revenge?”

Reynolds refused to go into details about why Peterson wanted Dodge dead, saying only that it all came back to drugs.

And he joined a number of law enforcement officials across the state, including South Carolina Corrections Director Bryan Stirling, in saying the federal government needs to stop its ban on jamming cellphone signals as soon as possible.

“This was only accomplished by the gangs having access to contraband telephones,” Reynolds said. “Common sense would tell us if the cellphone doesn’t work they will be of no use to the inmates.”

Court records did not list a lawyer for Peterson. Seven others face felony charges in the case ranging from murder to kidnapping to accessory and conspiracy.

Cellphones have been a critical part of Peterson’s life behind bars. Along with the drug ring that got him nearly three more decades in prison, Peterson has been caught with cellphones at least 10 times since 2012 and twice for being on social media, according to his prison discipline records .

Inmates are punished by losing privileges or being put in special confinement, but they can’t be kept like that forever, Stirling said.

“There are some people, it doesn’t matter what you do; the day they get out, they are going to get their hands on a cellphone,” Stirling said.

Cellphones were used to arrange a hit in 2010 that nearly killed a prison guard. An inmate recently escaped a maximum security prison with help from a cellphone and the devices appear to have played a key part in a 2018 riot at a state prison in Lee County where seven inmates were killed. And prison officials have little doubt that almost every day they allow inmates to continue to run their criminal enterprise while serving time.

“We shouldn’t have to be doing this over and over,” said Stirling, who has spent countless hours lobbying federal officials to allow an exception to a decades-old federal law prohibiting the jamming of a radio signal.

The prison in Lee County where the 2018 riot happened has a $1.5 million managed access system that allows only certain cellphone signals through. But it isn’t foolproof. Back in April, inmates at the prison broadcast on Facebook Live for an hour.

Federal officials did allow the state to test a jamming system this spring, but the results have not been made public.

Stirling said repeated searches for cellphones appear to have put some dent into their usage. He has been told a contraband phone that used to sell for a few hundred dollars is now going for $2,000 on the prison black market.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.