Take this bridge, get a million bucks. No one did | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Take this bridge, get a million bucks. No one did

Steven Adams
1733717_web1_ptr-Cash4Bridge-092819
Washington State Department of Transportation
The bridge was built in 1925, a 371-foot steel span that crossed the Puyallup River at Meridian, Washington, for more than 90 years.

There’s an old joke about selling bridges to people but this one was free. And it came with a million bucks. But no one would take it.

The bridge had carried traffic over the Puyallup River in Washington State since 1925, according to KIRO-7. But two new bridges replaced it in 2005 so it was parked nearby. Its historic status dictated that an effort needed to be made to preserve it.

The Washington State Department of Transportation offered the bridge to anyone who would take it away and preserve it. They even sweetened the deal with $1 million.

No one took it.

“Most people did their due diligence and said, ‘We can’t do that for that amount of money,’” WSDOT’s Steve Fuchs told KIRO-7.

Time has run out for the 370-ton span and its cash deal. It’s likely to end up as scrap.

Cutting the bridge apart for scrap could cost as much as a $1 million, but the steel is estimated to be worth less than $100,000, reports KIRO-7.

The bridge will remain parked where it is until someone needs it out of the way again.

Read more at KIRO-7.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.