Texas execution halted over claims judge was anti-Semitic | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Texas execution halted over claims judge was anti-Semitic

Associated Press
1767811_web1_1767811-8242df380e0b4a0387ed363e93ed5319
In this Dec. 3, 2003, file photo, death row inmate Randy Halprin, then 26, sits in a visitation cell at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas. Halprin, a Jewish death row inmate who was part of the “Texas 7” gang of escaped prisoners and facing execution in less than a week has won a reprieve after claiming the former judge, Vickers “Vic” Cunningham, at his trial was anti-Semitic and frequently used racial slurs. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Friday granted a stay of execution for Randy Halprin, who had been scheduled to receive a lethal injection on Oct. 10. (AP Photo/Brett Coomer)
1767811_web1_1767811-42223b9d41c344ba8953b0c4645add49
In this Feb. 9, 2018, file photo, former state District Judge Vickers “Vic” Cunningham, who was running for the Republican nomination for Dallas County commissioner in District 2, answers questions in an editorial board meeting at The Dallas Morning News in Dallas. Death-row inmate Randy Halprin, facing execution in less than a week, has won a reprieve after claiming Cunningham, presiding over his trial was anti-Semitic and frequently used racial slurs. (Vernon Bryant/The Dallas Morning News via AP)

HOUSTON — A Jewish death row inmate who was part of the “Texas 7” gang of escaped prisoners and faced execution in less than a week won a reprieve on Friday after claiming the former judge at his trial was anti-Semitic and frequently used racial slurs.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a stay of execution for Randy Halprin, who had been scheduled to receive a lethal injection on Oct. 10. The appeals court ordered Halprin’s case be sent back to the Dallas County court that convicted him, so it can review his claims that his trial judge was biased against him because he is Jewish.

Halprin’s attorneys are asking that he be granted a new trial.

“Today’s decision to stay Randy Halprin’s scheduled execution is a signal that bigotry and bias are unacceptable in the criminal justice system,” Tivon Schardl, one of Halprin’s attorneys, said in a statement.

Halprin was among the inmates who escaped from a South Texas prison in December 2000 and then committed numerous robberies, including the one in which they shot 29-year-old Irving police officer Aubrey Hawkins 11 times, killing him.

The escaped inmates were arrested a month later in Colorado, ending a six-week manhunt. One of them killed himself as officers closed in and the other six, including Halprin, were convicted of killing Hawkins and sentenced to death. Four of the six who were convicted have since been executed.

Halprin’s attorneys alleged in his appeal that friends and people who worked with ex-Judge Vickers Cunningham from Dallas County said he “did not like anyone not of his race, religion or creed” and used racial slurs and anti-Semitic language to refer to Halprin and some of the other “Texas 7” inmates who were convicted. Cunningham oversaw the trials of Halprin and other members of the gang.

The Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted Halprin, declined comment Friday. Cunningham, now an attorney in Dallas, also wouldn’t comment.

Cunningham faced allegations of bigotry last year after telling the Dallas Morning News he has a living trust that rewards his children for marrying straight, white Christians. Cunningham was running for county commissioner at the time, and he lost the Republican runoff days later.

Cunningham denied racial bigotry at the time of the Morning News interview. And he told the newspaper in June that the allegations made by Halprin’s lawyers were “fabrications” from his estranged brother.

Halprin’s attorneys said they only learned of Cunningham’s alleged bias through the newspaper’s reporting last year.

Halprin, who has maintained he never fired a weapon at the officer, was convicted under Texas’ law of parties, which holds a person criminally responsible for the actions of another if they are engaged in a conspiracy.

He was the second death row inmate in Texas set for execution this month who got a stay this week. On Thursday, a judge halted the Oct. 16 execution of 60-year-old Randall Wayne Mays. He was condemned for a 2007 shootout at his home in East Texas’ Henderson County that left two sheriff’s deputies dead.

Mays’ attorneys say he suffers from delusions and thinks Texas wants to execute him over a renewable energy design he believes he created. State District Judge Joe Clayton said he wanted time to review all submitted medical records in Mays’ case.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 barred the execution of intellectually disabled people but has given states some discretion to decide how to determine mental disability.

The next execution in Texas is set for Oct. 30.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.