Texas man accused of forging wife’s name on divorce papers shows up to court with new wife | TribLIVE.com

Texas man accused of forging wife’s name on divorce papers shows up to court with new wife

Samson X Horne

The Houston-area man who authorities were looking for last week under allegations that he forged his wife’s signature on divorce papers showed up to court Monday with — his new wife.

According to television station KCPR in Houston, Paul Nixon, 51, appeared at the Harris County Criminal court with not only his attorney, but a new bride.

The Houston disc jockey said he remarried once his divorce was finalized.

Nixon, who goes by the stage name DJ U-Shay, reportedly denied allegations that he forged his original wife’s signature in order to cease his previous nuptials.

His attorney said he was in Georgia last week when he found out about the allegations.

“He’s a legend here. He’s a legendary DJ here in Houston. He was actually on tour when he started receiving multiple phone calls, texts about this matter. Got on the first flight here, and came out, and we approached today for a bond,” said attorney Chaunte Sterling.

Nixon’s first wife, Edna, told authorities that Nixon was “living a double life,” adding that she never knew “we were headed to divorce.”

Edna told the station she is happy to sign real divorce papers if they are presented to her.

“He left with thousands of dollars of debt, things in my name, DJ equipment” she said. “He’s stolen from me.”

Paul Nixon is due back in court in November. He faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted.

Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Samson at 412-320-7845, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.