Three-eyed snake found on highway in Australia | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Three-eyed snake found on highway in Australia

Chris Pastrick
1102674_web1_ptr-threeeyesnake-050319
Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Service/Facebook
The Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Service shared images of a three-eyed snake on its Facebook page.
1102674_web1_ptr-threeeyedsnakeB-050319
Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Service/Facebook
The Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Service shared images of a three-eyed snake on its Facebook page.

Two-headed snakes are so old-school.

Now, a three-eyed snake, that’s something worth looking into.

Well, as luck would have it, one was discovered recently in Australia.

The Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Service posted the find on its Facebook page.

The service said its rangers found the juvenile carpet python, which was about 15½ inches long, on the Arnhem Highway near the small town of Humpty Doo.

Yep … Humpty Doo. It’s located near the northern tip of central Australia.

Snake expert Bryan Fry told the BBC News the snake — nicknamed Monty Python — mutant snakes are more common than one would think.

“Every baby has a mutation of some sort — this one is just particularly coarse and misshapen,” said Fry, a professor at the University of Queensland.

“I haven’t seen a three-eyed snake before, but we have a two-headed carpet python in our lab — it’s just a different kind of mutation like what we see with Siamese twins,”

Sadly, BBC News reports the baby python died just weeks after it was found in March.

Officials told BBC News the mutation made it difficult for the snake to eat.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.