ShareThis Page
Trump likes ‘actings,’ experts say permanent staff is better | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Trump likes ‘actings,’ experts say permanent staff is better

Associated Press
828832_web1_828832-3ad83e5a0f2e4599a09170d4aca65c49
AP
In this Jan. 2, 2019, file photo President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House, Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2019, in Washington, with from left, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar, acting Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt and acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan. William Barr’s confirmation as President Donald Trump’s second attorney general cut the roster of “acting” Cabinet secretaries and White House officials by one, but some say too many “actings” are still on the job, most visibly at the Defense Department.

WASHINGTON — Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan has been to Europe, Iraq, Afghanistan and the Mexican border as part of his bid to land the job permanently. Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney was one of just two top advisers to join President Donald Trump for dinner with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un. As acting environmental chief, Andrew Wheeler spent months advancing proposals to ease emission limits for power plants, cars, and oil and gas facilities before Trump nominated him to lead the agency for the long term.

Trump opened his third year in office with a Cabinet that included an outsize number of secretaries and other advisers with “acting” in front of their titles, including the attorney general. Trump doesn’t seem to mind, and the temporary job status has not kept these officials from diving into their jobs, representing the United States around the world and conducting business alongside the president. But good-government experts and others say it’s important to install permanent people in top jobs to maintain stability.

“Actings are not long-termers,” said Paul Light, a federal government expert.

Trump has had an acting defense secretary, chief of staff, budget director and ambassador to the United Nations since the beginning of the year. The Senate last week confirmed Wheeler to lead the Environmental Protection Agency after he spent seven months in an interim role, and Trump has nominated acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt to head that department, where he’s been serving in an interim role since December. William Barr is the new attorney general, after the post was filled for three months by Matthew Whitaker in an acting capacity.

Trump says placeholder officials give him more “flexibility.” But flexibility for what? Neither Trump nor the White House has fully explained.

“My ‘actings’ are doing really great,” Trump said earlier this year. “David (Bernhardt) is doing great at Interior. Mick Mulvaney is doing great as chief of staff. But I sort of like ‘acting.’ It gives me more flexibility. Do you understand that? I like ‘acting.’ So we have a few that are ‘acting.’ We have a great, great Cabinet.”

He recently told a TV interviewer: “It’s easier to make moves when they’re acting.”

Max Stier, president and CEO of the Partnership for Public Service, which advocates for more efficiency in government, said having too many acting leaders creates “unbelievable uncertainty.” Stier said people seek government employment not just to serve the president but to work for specific leaders.

“People coming in might not know who their boss will be,” he said. Turnover at the top can also make it harder to fill second- and third-string jobs.

Trump is also known to quickly turn on aides he once praised, which has contributed to high levels of turnover inside the White House and throughout the government.

Two years into his four-year term, Trump is already on his third national security adviser and third White House chief of staff. Several Cabinet secretary slots, including at the State, Health and Human Services and Veterans Affairs departments, also turned over in Trump’s first two years.

And it isn’t just the top jobs Trump has had difficulty filling. Some second- and third-tier jobs are also vacant, including the deputy secretary positions at the Homeland Security and Housing and Urban Development departments. Trump has left scores of other positions throughout government unfilled in favor of a leaner bureaucracy.

He has signaled that he is in no rush to replace his “acting” secretaries, perhaps viewing them as more inclined to support him, especially if they hope to land the jobs permanently.

“Given how quickly Trump sours on the people who work for him, this approach gives him flexibility to decide how long he wants these officials around,” said Chris Lu, who was the White House Cabinet secretary under President Barack Obama. “It also keeps people on their toes and ensures loyalty.”

Light, a professor at New York University’s school of public service, said the law limits the amount of time an “acting” official can serve to about seven months. He said it gives presidents flexibility to get someone into a job quickly and also replace that official quickly with a Senate-confirmed candidate, rather than hold jobs open for indefinite periods of time.

Light added that “actings” often aren’t viewed as having the same level of authority as a Cabinet secretary who has been approved by the Senate.

Shanahan, who was the deputy defense secretary, has had the “acting” job since Jan. 1. It remains unclear whether Trump will nominate Shanahan to succeed Jim Mattis, who resigned over policy disagreements with Trump, or ultimately pick another candidate. That leaves the Pentagon with an acting secretary for just the third time in its history, and for the first time since 1989.

Trump has publicly praised Shanahan, who used a recent Oval Office appearance to return the compliment.

As Trump prepared to sign papers directing the Pentagon to create a new military branch dedicated to space, a Trump idea that Shanahan supports, the president yielded the floor to Shanahan.

“This is a historic moment,” he told Trump.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.