Trump surprises officials with nomination of Mark Morgan to head ICE |

Trump surprises officials with nomination of Mark Morgan to head ICE

The Washington Post
Former U.S. Border Patrol Chief Mark Morgan testifies on Thursday, April 4, 2019, before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Trump is tapping former border patrol chief Morgan to lead Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Trump tweeted Sunday, May 5, 2019 that Mark Morgan ‘will be joining the Trump Administration as the head of our hard working men and women of ICE.’

WASHINGTON — President Trump announced his choice to lead U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Sunday, tapping a former FBI official who frequently appears on cable news advocating for the president’s immigration policies.

In a tweet, Trump called Mark Morgan, who briefly ran the U.S. Border Patrol under President Barack Obama, “a true believer and an American Patriot. He will do a great job!”

Trump, who has made tougher immigration enforcement a pillar of his presidential campaign and his administration, recently pulled the nomination of his previous choice to run ICE, saying he wanted to go in “a tougher direction.”

In Morgan, Trump has found a vocal advocate for some of his positions, particularly the construction of a wall on the border with Mexico. Morgan has said such a wall would be an effective way to reduce illegal border crossings.

Trump’s Twitter announcement that Morgan “will be joining the Trump Administration as the head of our hard working men and women of ICE” caught White House aides and Homeland Security Department officials by surprise. They had not been informed that Morgan was Trump’s choice, and at ICE, senior leaders learned of the decision from the president’s tweet, according to two senior administration officials.

It was not immediately clear whether Trump had formally nominated Morgan or plans to do so. The position of ICE director requires Senate confirmation, but some Homeland Security officials speculated that Morgan would be named deputy director, a role that does not require confirmation, and he would lead the agency in an acting capacity as ICE’s de facto senior leader.

Trump has said he likes having agency leaders in an acting role because it gives him more flexibility to change personnel if they do not perform to his liking. Trump last month cleared out the leadership ranks of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, and has sought to install officials whom he perceives as loyal to the White House. The White House and the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to requests for clarification on Morgan’s exact role.

Morgan, who had been in his position at the Border Patrol for a few months before he was ousted shortly after Trump took office, seems to have auditioned for his new job largely via television appearances.

Particularly on Fox News, Morgan has given his support to the president’s declaration of a national emergency to enable him to build a border wall. And he often recounts his time working on the border in El Paso, Texas, and tracking the MS-13 gang in California during his long career in the FBI.

“I actually supervised the MS-13 Gang Force in Southern California,” Morgan said on Fox host Tucker Carlson’s show in January. “We used to catch them on surveillance wires, and they would laugh. MS-13 gang members would laugh how easy it was to go back and forth between the Mexico and U.S. border.”

Trump has called Morgan after his TV appearances to praise his performance, according to a U.S. official and an outside adviser to the president. Trump has told advisers that he likes getting support from a former Obama administration official who is also willing to back his tougher policies, administration officials have said.

At the Department of Homeland Security, Morgan is viewed as a capable and hard-charging law enforcement official, but he was widely resented during his Border Patrol tenure by the agency’s senior officials and union chief Brandon Judd.

In 2014, then-FBI Director James Comey sent Morgan on temporary duty to help overhaul Border Patrol use-of-force policies after a series of deadly shootings by agents. Morgan contended with an insular Border Patrol culture, public perceptions of a lack of accountability and a union whose leaders wield considerable clout.

Two years later, when Morgan left the FBI for good to become Border Patrol chief, Comey was among those who praised the decision.

“Mark’s outstanding investigative work and leadership have been an incredible asset to the FBI, and he will be missed,” said Comey, who was fired by Trump in May 2017.

Morgan, a former Marine who ran the FBI’s El Paso office, was the first Border Patrol chief to come from outside the agency. Senior Border Patrol officials struggled with the sight of an outsider wearing the green uniform who hadn’t paid his dues working “the line” with the rank and file.

The changes he helped institute were widely seen as a success, and officer-involved shootings at U.S. Customs and Border Protection have declined from a high of 55 in 2012 to 15 last year, a 73% drop.

“He was the first Border Patrol chief to come from outside, and he was strong on accountability and use of force,” said Gil Kerlikowske, the CBP commissioner during Obama’s second term and Morgan’s superior. “But those were the reasons the union opposed him.”

Morgan worked closely with then-Deputy CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan, but Morgan was forced out days after Trump took office, a move viewed at the time as a favor to Judd, the union chief who endorsed Trump and backed his plan for a border wall.

“He didn’t know the job to begin with,” Judd told The Associated Press in 2017. “He had to go on a tour of all the Border Patrol sectors to get an understanding. We needed a chief to hit the ground running.”

The career Border Patrol official who replaced Morgan, Ronald Vitiello, became Trump’s previous choice to lead ICE, but the White House abruptly pulled his nomination last month.

Trump blindsided Homeland Security Department officials with his decision to go another way. Kirstjen Nielsen, then the Homeland Security Department secretary, learned from Capitol Hill officials about Vitiello’s removal and could not reverse it, according to a former senior administration official. Stephen Miller, the president’s hard-line aide overseeing immigration policy, pushed the president to get rid of Vitiello, according to officials.

McAleenan is now the acting head of the Homeland Security Department, and he and Morgan are facing an unprecedented surge of Central American migrant families crossing the border to apply for humanitarian asylum. Illegal crossings have reached a 12-year high, pushing U.S. immigration enforcement to “the breaking point,” according to McAleenan.

The acting secretary praised Trump’s announcement.

“(Morgan’s) record of service is needed to address the crisis at the border and support the men and women of Immigration and Customs Enforcement,” McAleenan said in a statement. “The depth of his experience will be an asset to the Department and I look forward to working with him.”

Trump’s frustrations with a surge in border crossings prompted him to fire Nielsen last month. She had been a frequent target of criticism from immigration firebrand and Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, whose show is a must-see for the president.

Morgan appeared on Dobbs’ show Wednesday. The host asked him to address rumors that he was under consideration to lead ICE.

Morgan said no one from the White House had called him or had a conversation “at all” about leading the agency, calling the reports “rumors.”

“But if this president asked me to come up, I’d say yes in a heartbeat,” Morgan said, raising his voice. “This isn’t based on ideology, this is based on 30 years of law enforcement, and I know this border. The president’s doing the right thing, he’s right on this issue, and if he asks, I’d go work for him in a heartbeat.”

Alan Bersin, a top border official under the Obama and Clinton administrations, called Morgan a “steady, reliable professional.”

“This is giving (McAleenan) the people that he wants in place,” said Bersin, who was CBP commissioner from 2010 to 2011. “If Kevin gets his way, we’ll get a sensible approach to the border, but that remains to be seen. For the first time, thanks to Kevin, they’re looking at the underlying problem.”

Bersin said the immigration system is foundering because tens of thousands of families are seeking asylum and clogging the immigration court system.

Naming Morgan could set up a team that would address issues with the asylum system and work closely with Mexico to block smuggling from Central America.

To achieve that, however, he said the agencies must also set enforcement priorities, as they did under the Obama administration, which focused on deporting serious criminals and recent border crossers. Trump scuttled those priorities and has said anyone here illegally could be deported, which pleased the immigration and Border Patrol unions that had backed his candidacy for president.

“One would hope that Trump and Miller would understand that following their advice, together with their own doing, has led them to real disaster,” Bersin said. “The problem is that they have always since the beginning confused toughness at the border with needless cruelty and substantial illegality.”

Bersin noted that Trump is deporting fewer migrants than were deported under Obama and past presidents.

“They haven’t created a successful deterrent,” he said. “All in all, the Trump record has been the worst in 30 years.”

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.