U.K. town evacuated over fears of dam collapse | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

U.K. town evacuated over fears of dam collapse

Associated Press
1486102_web1_1486102-d68501bc46d84f1ebc5fab27c0f3c719
AP
A team of men look at the damage to the wall of Toddbrook Reservoir near the village of Whaley Bridge, Cheshire, England, on Thursday. British police have ordered the evacuation of a town of 6,500 residents in northwest England over fears that a dam could collapse.

LONDON — British police have ordered the evacuation of a town of 6,500 residents in northwest England over fears that a dam could collapse.

The Derbyshire Police force says residents of Whaley Bridge should leave their homes because of the “significant threat to life.”

A dam wall at the 19th-century Toddbrook Reservoir above the town has been damaged by days of heavy rain that has caused flooding across northern England.

The police force urged residents Thursday to leave their homes and head for a local school.

Police in the town 175 miles northwest of London tweeted: “This is not a decision that has been taken lightly and we appreciate that there is significant impact on this community, however this is an unprecedented, fast-moving emergency situation.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.