White ex-officer’s guilty verdict stuns some black advocates | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

White ex-officer’s guilty verdict stuns some black advocates

Associated Press
1750726_web1_1750726-e2fa4460477b44c698fd66bcaee5cd6c
In this Sept. 21, 2017, file photo, provided by Harding University in Searcy, Ark., Botham Jean leads worship at a university presidential reception in Dallas. Fired Dallas police Officer Amber Guyger, who shot and killed Botham Jean, an unarmed 26-year-old neighbor in his own apartment last year, was found guilty of murder by a jury on Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019. She told police she thought his apartment was her own and that he was an intruder.(Jeff Montgomery/Harding University via AP)
1750726_web1_1750726-af261aed6380495097db22f95c796aba
Allison Jean, center, the mother of Botham Jean, hugs a supporter after fired Dallas police officer Amber Guyger was found guilty of murder, Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019, in Dallas. Guyger shot and killed Botham Jean, an unarmed 26-year-old neighbor in his own apartment last year. She told police she thought his apartment was her own and that he was an intruder. (AP Photo/LM Otero)
1750726_web1_1750726-a84557d137f841aa9b9464d8d28081f5
FILE - In this Friday, Sept. 27, 2019, file pool photo, fired Dallas police officer Amber Guyger becomes emotional as she testifies in her murder trial in Dallas. Guyger, who said she fatally shot her unarmed, black neighbor after mistaking his apartment for her own was found guilty of murder on Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019. A jury reached the verdict in the high-profile trial for the killing of Botham Jean after six days of witness testimony but just a handful of hours of deliberation. (Tom Fox/The Dallas Morning News via AP, Pool, File)
1750726_web1_1750726-612e0b0226654695866abc4b9313b98d
Monica Jones, a 34-year-old transgender woman, poses for a portrait Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019, in Phoenix. Jones was surprised by the guilty verdict of white former Dallas Police Officer Amber Guyger, who shot and killed her unarmed black neighbor. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
1750726_web1_1750726-b5b2920dba344560b0e7043308b0963f
Monica Jones, a 34-year-old transgender woman, poses for a portrait Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019, in Phoenix. Jones was surprised by the guilty verdict of white former Dallas Police Officer Amber Guyger, who shot and killed her unarmed black neighbor. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
1750726_web1_1750726-a18e5bbf82844326990a3dbfea23e75b
Monica Jones, a 34-year-old transgender woman, poses for a portrait Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019, in Phoenix. Jones was surprised by the guilty verdict of white former Dallas Police Officer Amber Guyger, who shot and killed her unarmed black neighbor. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Monica Blake watched closely as a Texas jury weighed the case against a white police officer charged in the fatal shooting of a black neighbor, wondering whether the panel would render a different decision than so many others in recent years.

When Amber Guyger was convicted of murder Tuesday, Blake, a retired Nashville, Tennessee, officer, wept in disbelief.

“I’m so happy,” said Blake, who is black. “But of course, nobody wins.”

C.J. Lawrence, a Jackson, Mississippi-based civil rights attorney and founder of the advocacy website Black With No Chaser , said the verdict offered one clear message: “Black people won’t become criminals in their own homes.”

While activists and observers welcomed the rare conviction, most cautioned that the outcome was not the result of changing attitudes, but of a rare set of circumstances: an unarmed black man killed in his apartment by an off-duty white officer who said she mistakenly believed she was in her own home.

“There was just a perfect storm of behavior and situations that made the classic playbook insufficient,” said Color of Change Executive Director Rashad Robinson. “But I don’t think any of us can take solace that the rules, whether they be written or unwritten, have changed.”

On the night of Sept. 6, 2018, Guyger walked up to Botham Jean’s fourth-floor apartment — directly above hers — and found the door unlocked. Still dressed in her uniform after a long shift, she entered and found Jean eating a bowl of ice cream in his living room. She shot the 26-year-old accountant with her service weapon.

Jean’s death drew widespread attention both nationally and in his native St. Lucia and joined the growing list of cases fueling the Black Lives Matter Movement , which emerged in 2014 after the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

Convictions have been few in the past five years as activists and protesters have attempted to highlight such killings and push for policing reforms and more prosecutions.

Moments after the verdict, African Americans took to social media and YouTube to express their surprise around a case some regarded as the epitome of how whites see black bodies as a threat. Most said they were prepared to be disappointed — again.

During the trial, they were frustrated as Guyger’s defense team attempted to portray the killer as the victim and Jean as a threat.

Guyger told authorities she mistakenly thought Jean was an intruder. During the trial, she tearfully took the stand and apologized for killing him. Robinson said those optics were meant to draw sympathy from jurors.

“We have a long history in this country of white women’s tears and fear being an excuse for harming and killing black people,” he said. “For many people watching the trial, there was a deep fear that this would be another one of those situations. All they needed was one juror.”

Monica Jones, a 34-year-old transgender woman in Phoenix, called Guyger “a perfect victim” who would play off whites’ sympathies compared to a black man who could be vilified, even though he was sitting innocently in his apartment.

Under Texas law, Guyger’s sentence could range from five years to life in prison. Robinson said the sentencing decision “will send a message to the community about justice.”

Campaign Zero co-founder and Ferguson activist Brittany Packnett said that there are still too many people willing to excuse the officer’s actions.

Tensions intensified Monday after jurors were told they could consider whether Guyger had a right to use deadly force under a Texas law known as the “castle doctrine” — even though she was not in her own home.

The law is similar to “stand your ground” measures that declare a person has no duty to retreat from an intruder. Prosecutor Jason Fine told jurors that the law would have empowered Jean to shoot someone barging into his apartment, but it doesn’t apply “the other way around.”

The idea that the castle doctrine could be invoked, “reflects the fact that we’ve still got progress to make,” Packnett said.

Packnett pointed out that while police kill more than 1,000 people a year, only 35 officers have been convicted in the last 14 years. The percentage of those convicted of killing black people is even smaller.

“One case does not mean the problem is solved,” Packnett said.

She credited the diversity of the jury pool as a possible factor in the outcome. “The question still remains for me: Would a whiter jury have convicted her? Sadly, I fear the answer is still no.”

The anticipation of the verdict heightened tensions in a city with a troubled history involving police and communities of color. Dallas leaders point to reforms and the hiring of officers of color as evidence that the police force has evolved.

Robinson pointed to the election of a new district attorney in Dallas as a sign of progress, with the Guyger case factoring into the race.

“As a result, you also had folks trying this case who knew the public was watching and expecting something new,” Robinson said. “Part of how we change the narrative is changing what’s acceptable and changing what’s possible.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.