Woman pecked to death by her own rooster | TribLIVE.com

Woman pecked to death by her own rooster

Chris Pastrick

A woman in Australia was killed in a freak rooster attack. And experts say it should be a warning to us all.

As published in the journal Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, a 76-year-old Australian woman was gathering eggs on her rural property when her own rooster attacked her, pecking her several times in her lower leg. The rooster’s jabs were enough to cause significant hemorrhaging and made the woman collapse.

The authors of the scientific report — Judith Fronczek and Roger W. Byard — write that the woman had, among various medical issues, varicose veins. They said the rooster had managed to peck and strike a large varix on her leg, leading to exsanguination — meaning her body was drained of blood.

Byard, a forensic expert at Adelaide University, told 9news.com.au the lesson is a serious one.

“I want people to be aware that varicose veins are dangerous,” he said. “Elderly peoples’ skin is thin, and the veins are close to the surface. It’s extremely easy to damage the veins, and even a small hole is life threatening.”

Even small injuries can have fatal consequences, Byard warns.

“My three main points would be this; never trust a rooster, get your veins fixed and if you happen to injure yourself, perform immediate first aid. Put pressure on the wound, lie horizontally, and get assessed by a medical professional if need be.”

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.