Woman sues Jeffrey Epstein estate, saying she was abused at age 14 | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Woman sues Jeffrey Epstein estate, saying she was abused at age 14

Associated Press
1692668_web1_AP19254766586812
AP
This March 28, 2017, file photo, provided by the New York State Sex Offender Registry shows Jeffrey Epstein.

NEW YORK — A woman whose claims of sexual abuse against Jeffrey Epstein were outlined in a federal indictment sued his estate Wednesday, saying the wealthy financier took advantage of her family’s poor financial position to abuse her from age 14 to 17.

The lawsuit in Manhattan federal court sought unspecified damages on behalf of a woman identified only as “Jane Doe.” The lawsuit said she was “Minor Victim-1” in federal sex trafficking charges that led to Epstein’s July 6 arrest. The sex trafficking charges were dismissed after Epstein killed himself in jail in August while awaiting trial.

According to the lawsuit, the woman suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression as a result of sexual abuse she endured from 2002 to 2005 at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion.

The lawsuit maintained that the teenager was about 14 years old, perhaps younger, when she was lured to his mansion by another older teenage girl who told her she could earn money.

At the time, the lawsuit said, the teenager’s family was “in serious financial straits” with her mother and sister sharing a bedroom, and other bedrooms rented to strangers to help pay rent.

The plaintiff was forced to move out and stayed with various friends and took odd jobs after school to help her family financially, the lawsuit said.

When she entered Epstein’s mansion, she thought it “looked like the castle in the fairytale ‘Beauty and the Beast,’ one of her favorite Disney movies at the time,” the lawsuit said.

The sexual abuse began on that first visit and continued for three years, the lawsuit said.

“As her visits became more frequent, Epstein’s sexual abuse of Doe became more severe,” it said. “While Epstein physically and emotionally hurt and exploited Doe, a vulnerable young girl, she also became financially dependent on him. She stopped attending school and spent almost all her time ‘working’ at his home, gratifying him sexually, or bringing other girls to do the same.”

She was sexually abused “countless times over the course of three years,” the lawsuit said.

It said the abuse was facilitated by two of Epstein’s employees who were named in a 2008 deal with federal prosecutors in Florida as protected along with Epstein from further federal prosecution. At that time, Epstein pleaded guilty to state prostitution-related charges in Florida and served 13 months in jail.

In recent weeks, several women have sued Epstein’s estate, alleging that he continued to carry out sexual assaults when he was permitted to leave jail to go to work and continued assaults after his release. Prosecutors in New York said they were not bound by the non-prosecution agreement he had signed in Florida.

Epstein took his life after pleading not guilty to the New York charges. A judge had ordered him detained without bail as a danger to the community and a risk to flee.

A message was left seeking comment from a lawyer for Epstein’s estate.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.