ShareThis Page
Ben Schmitt

Overdose data at heart of feud over curbing drug abuse

Ben Schmitt
| Monday, Oct. 17, 2016, 7:51 p.m.
U.S. Attorney David J. Hickton speaks at a news conference announcing an indictment charging Price Montgomery with witness tampering crimes at the Federal Courthouse in downtown Pittsburgh on Monday, April 4, 2016. The charges relate to the killing of federal witness Tina Crawford on August, 22, 2014.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
U.S. Attorney David J. Hickton speaks at a news conference announcing an indictment charging Price Montgomery with witness tampering crimes at the Federal Courthouse in downtown Pittsburgh on Monday, April 4, 2016. The charges relate to the killing of federal witness Tina Crawford on August, 22, 2014.

A puzzling bureaucratic feud simmers in the background of joint efforts to stamp out Pennsylvania's deadly opioid crisis.

Perhaps it's just a misunderstanding.

The dispute centers on data — namely statistics of Pennsylvania residents who have died from opioids or heroin.

David Hickton, U.S. attorney for Western Pennsylvania, says the numbers are imperative in learning where so-called overdose hotspots are. Earlier this month in a news conference, he called out coroners in rural areas across the state for what he described as resisting to share overdose data from death certificates and coroners' investigations.

“We need to understand where the hotspots are so we can surge resources to create intervention,” he told me in a follow-up conversation last week. “We want to catch the epidemic instead of chase it.”

The Pennsylvania Coroners Association responded with disbelief.

Its president, Charles Kiessling Jr., the coroner of Lycoming County, said Hickton was misguided in his accusations.

Coroners have minimal staffing, Kiessling explained. Many of them work part time and have other jobs. For example, some are funeral directors.

Toxicology reports in suspected fatal overdoses don't just materialize overnight.

“We don't have an in-house forensic pathologist in house,” Kiessling said. “Ours is in Allentown — 144 miles down the road.”

Logistical delays are understandable and perhaps rectified by a few strategical meetings, Hickton said.

Still, he took aim at the coroners association for other perceived stonewalling tactics.

Hickton said he's learned that Susan Shanaman, an attorney and legislative liaison to the coroners association, discouraged some coroners from sharing overdose data with the Drug Enforcement Administration.

He theorized as to why:

In some small towns, families of possible overdose victims do not want the cause of death listed on a death certificate.

“I acknowledge that is a struggle in rural communities where everybody knows everybody,” Hickton said. “People don't want to feel embarrassed. But we have to get past that stigma.”

He also wondered whether the coroners association wanted to hoard the statistics in order to receive grant money for its own database.

Shanaman questioned Hickton's information source.

“I can tell you that the reports I have done for the coroners and medical examiners on the yearly drug deaths have been done without grant money and with considerable work from the coroners and medical examiners and have been released publicly and are on the PSCA website for anyone to review,” she said. “Nor am I aware of any grant money being sought by them.”

Shanaman believes in concentrating on overdose survival statistics as a portal for addiction treatment.

“I also believe that the current emphasis on collecting death numbers is not helping in resolving this drug epidemic,” she said. “If we continue to fight over which group gets paid to do another report on the death numbers generated by the persons who are elected to do the death investigations, then we are doing nothing more than establishing a drug policy which deals with drug use one grave at a time.”

Hickton agreed that all data surrounding drug overdoses is important. There were 3,383 reported fatal drug overdoses in Pennsylvania in 2015 — 81 percent of which are believed to have been caused by heroin or opioid use.

“I want to put a spotlight on anyone who is under the illusion that we are going to stand for hoarding or hiding data, especially for those trying to treat this data as currency,” he said. “The data belongs to the public, and it should be freely shared.”

Hickton has threatened legal action against anyone holding back data.

Do the verbal jabs simply amount to lack of communication?

Stay tuned.

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me