Cal Thomas: A plan to fix Baltimore |
Featured Commentary

Cal Thomas: A plan to fix Baltimore

Cal Thomas
Bloomberg photo by Zach Gibson
Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley

Former South Carolina governor and U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley has urged President Trump and Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings to stop exchanging insults over conditions in Baltimore.

Haley scolded Trump for his recent tweet that appeared to mock Cummings for an attempted break-in at the congressman’s Baltimore home, tweeting “This is so unnecessary.” She added, “Instead of all of this back and forth about who everyone thinks is racist and who is not, the President just offered to help the people of Baltimore. They should take him up on it. Let’s put the same energy into where it will make a difference.”

The president should call a meeting that includes not only Cummings and Haley, but HUD Secretary Ben Carson, a former pediatric neurosurgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The meeting should also include corporate heads with experience in urban renewal and Habitat for Humanity, which builds houses for the poor.

Carson and Haley would mobilize volunteers to help remove trash from neighborhoods. Pest removal companies would eradicate rats from infested areas. Construction companies would tear down abandoned buildings. New homes would be built in their place. Tax breaks would be offered to businesses that establish a presence in restored neighborhoods.

Unemployed adults would be trained with skills needed by employers. Free bus transportation would be offered during the training period and for the first few months of a new job. Young children would be cared for at churches, or daycare centers, subsidized by voluntary donations and tax money. Older children would be allowed to escape their dangerous and underperforming public schools.

The Children’s Scholarship Fund (CSF), based in New York, has a Baltimore chapter. In an email, CSF President Darla Romfo says: “Our program currently helps 275 kids in Baltimore. 40 percent of eligible families applied when we first offered scholarships in 1999.” She estimates at least 4,000 (“and probably more”) are on wait lists for space in charter and private schools — and scholarship money — to become available. CSF children receive uniforms, teachers who love them and are told God does, too. They discover a purpose for their lives and hope for a better future.

The president should make this a cause and Baltimore an example of what good-hearted people can do to solve a problem. Volunteers would get satisfaction from contributing to the improvement of peoples’ lives. Corporations who donate their services could deflect the “evil” label some politicians have attached to them. Critics would be hard-pressed to call Trump a racist if he saves the lives of many underprivileged citizens in that city, which could then serve as a model for others, notably Los Angeles and San Francisco.

The political benefits to the president and Republicans could be enormous, but that should not be their primary motivation. A plaque Ronald Reagan had on his desk in the Oval Office read, “There is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he does not mind who gets the credit.”

Do this, Mr. President, and you will fulfill many verses in Scripture that command us to help the poor. One is Proverbs 19:17: “Whoever is kind to the poor lends to the Lord, and he will reward them for what they have done.”

Another is more direct and personal: “Rich people who see a brother or sister in need, yet close their hearts against them, cannot claim that they love God.” (1 John 3:17)

Cal Thomas is a syndicated columnist.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.