ShareThis Page
Colin Hanna: Economic growth, new jobs, strengthened pensions |
Featured Commentary

Colin Hanna: Economic growth, new jobs, strengthened pensions

Colin Hanna
| Wednesday, January 9, 2019 7:00 p.m

From 2012-17, the private equity industry invested $127 billion in Pennsylvania and employed more than 180,000 workers at private equity-backed companies. Despite the industry’s clear record of driving economic growth and creating jobs while strengthening pensions for public servants across Pennsylvania, it is under attack.

Pension fund portfolio managers should and often do review their investments and fees to maximize returns for retirement accounts of public workers. The managers who oversee the Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) and Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS) should be no different, but when looking to change investment paths, an astute manager will ask — at what cost?

The fact is, for the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System, private equity remains the highest performing asset class over 10 years. Year after year, private equity continues to prove it’s an important piece of a diversified investment portfolio. In their most recent report, SERS had a 10-year annualized return on private equity of 7.5 percent, net of fees. These strong returns result in stronger pensions for Pennsylvania teachers, firefighters and other public servants.

Private equity can deliver higher returns for pensions and other investors because it is skills-based, hands-on business building. Private equity firms, of which there are 153 based in Pennsylvania, employ large teams of some of the nation’s best business executives, and actually own and operate entire companies with the goal of making them better. After taking risks to invest in a range of businesses, the private equity industry — and the common practice of treating the shared profits from long-term investments as long-term capital gains, carried interest — is being demonized.

Private equity invests in businesses across the country, improving the lives of millions of Americans each day. In Pennsylvania, private equity invests in companies and small businesses that need capital to keep their doors open, create new jobs and grow their footprints.

Dollar General, Hilton Hotels, Dunkin Donuts and Yankee Candle are just a few of hundreds of companies in Pennsylvania that have been strengthened by private equity investment. These examples, along with hundreds of other Pennsylvania companies, grow, save jobs and increase tax revenue to the state treasury while boosting the retirement portfolio of public employee pensions.

A wise steward of the financial future of our public servants should always be prudent with pension investments. The managers who oversee PSERS and SERS have done well for state teachers and employees with their private equity investments. Any evaluation should be fact-based, with a review of all the data. We should not cherry-pick one number and wrap it with political rhetoric.

Private equity’s record is clear: The industry has invested more than $127 billion to improve businesses in Pennsylvania, supports more than 180,000 Pennsylvania jobs, and is one of the highest performing asset classes over 10 years. This is the future retirement of public workers, and the debate should rise above politics.

Colin Hanna is president of Let Freedom Ring USA Inc.,
a West Chester-based nonprofit public policy organization
committed to promoting constitutional government,
free enterprise and traditional values.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.