Colin McNickle: Budget challenges for Port Authority |

Colin McNickle: Budget challenges for Port Authority

Colin McNickle

A number of issues, nagging and expensive, face the Port Authority of Allegheny County in its proposed fiscal 2019-20 budget, says the research director at the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy.

“An expiring labor contract and new hires are key drivers of operating expense increases for the mass transit authority,” Eric Montarti says. “A lawsuit over turnpike tolls is affecting the capital budget.”

The authority’s preliminary operating budget features a $29.1 million deficit — $376 million in operating revenues and grants but $405.1 million in net expenses.

Given that the Port Authority is required by state law to have a balanced budget, “some maneuvering will likely occur,” Montarti says.

Authority expenses are budgeted to grow by more than 6.1% or $23.2 million to $405.1 million. Those are paced by wages, salaries, pensions and other benefits. Wages and salaries are set to rise by 5.1% or $8.7 million over fiscal 2018-19 to $178.1 million. In the last year of their four-year labor contract, unionized transit workers will receive a 3% raise next year.

The fiscal 2019-20 budget says pensions and other benefits will increase by 3.5% or by $5.5 million to $160.5 million.

“A big wage or benefit increase in the next labor contract will certainly drive up these costs,” Montarti notes. “The fact that transit strikes are still permitted by state law is hard to believe given the power imbalance it can create in negotiations.”

Most interestingly, the Port Authority plans to add 37 new employees at a cost of $3.7 million, which accounts for 26% of the $14.2 million growth in the two large expense categories. That translates into $100,000 in salary and benefits per employee.

In addition, just about every other expense category, sans materials and supplies and provisions for injuries and damages, is projected to grow year over year.

“The 6.1% increase in expenses will far outpace the growth in unlinked trips,” Montarti says.

The Port Authority, of course, is not sustained by fares alone. For fiscal 2019-20, the state will provide $234.3 million in operating assistance. Allegheny County must provide a 15% match. The money, $32.3 million, comes from the county’s tax on alcohol sales and rental vehicles and a $3 million grant from the county’s Regional Asset District.

“With the county controller’s audit noting that the county’s transit support fund is overflowing with a surplus from drink and car rental taxes, it is still a wonder why the Regional Asset District continues to provide money for the required operating match,” Montarti says.

The Port Authority’s fiscal 2019-20 capital budget — $58.1 million and funded primarily by the state and federal government — is markedly lower than projected in past years. That’s due to a pending lawsuit challenging the use of Pennsylvania Turnpike tolls for mass transit. Some capital projects could be deferred pending the outcome.

Do remember that when it comes to peer transit agencies, the Port Authority’s bus operations, its primary service mode, are very expensive.

“It was 30% higher than a peer group put together by the (state) auditor general’s office, and our previous work found the same in comparison to Boston, Washington, D.C., Columbus and Buffalo,” Montarti reminds. “Even the (authority’s) 2018 service report shows the authority third highest out of 10 transit agencies on bus cost per passenger.”

That report cited high operator and maintenance wages and benefits and high maintenance costs.

“Will the next decade bring action on how to correct them?” Montarti asks.

Colin McNickle is communications and marketing director at the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy and can be reached via email.

Categories: Opinion
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.