Colin McNickle: Chaos ahead for Pa. transportation funding? | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

Colin McNickle: Chaos ahead for Pa. transportation funding?

Colin McNickle
620545_web1_Turnpike-interchange2

A nasty storm could be brewing for Pennsylvania’s transportation funding regimen, says the executive director of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy.

And, it’s all been fueled by dubious state legislation that long has milked the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (PTC) for millions of dollars to, in contravention of federal law, help pay for non-turnpike projects.

The result has been a public policy mess — ever-rising turnpike tolls and intractable debt, a predictable cooling in utilization, and a lawsuit, that if successful, would throw transportation funding in the commonwealth into chaos.

“While many decry the (toll) rate increases, they also forget the misguided legislation that creates this situation,” says Frank Gamrat.

The seeds of this burgeoning mess were planted with the original Act 44 of 2007. It sought to turn Interstate 80, across the norther tier of Pennsylvania, into a toll road. The deal called for the PTC to take over the road from the state Department of Transportation, toll it, then transfer $900 million annually to PennDOT beginning in fiscal 2009 (increasing 2.5 percent each year thereafter).

Pols considered the move a magic bullet to address Pennsylvania’s chronic highway, bridge and mass-transit funding challenges. But, a not-so-funny thing happened on the way to funding nirvana: Federal law requires all proceeds from tolled interstate highways to be reinvested in those highways.

The feds thrice rejected the commonwealth’s gambol in lawlessness. But, that didn’t stop the gambaulders from playing games.

“Even though permission to toll Interstate 80 was not granted, the revised legislation kept the PTC on the hook for payments to PennDOT, albeit at a reduced rate of $450 million per year starting in fiscal 2011,” says Gamrat.

That’s after paying $750 million in fiscal 2008, $850 million in fiscal 2009 and the full $900 million in fiscal 2010. Then came Act 89 of 2013, which raised the gasoline tax, and reduced the Turnpike Commission’s remittance obligation to PennDOT to $50 million annually beginning in fiscal 2023.

In fiscal 2018, more than half of that $450 million annual diversion — $250 million – went to mass transit. But, again, any money taken from the PTC for non-turnpike upkeep is in contravention of federal law. And, that has critically strapped the commission.

Not only did it just raise tolls for the 10th consecutive year, in order to pay its annual $450 million tribute to PennDOT, it has been, for several years, forced to issued debt against mainline tolls.

In fiscal 2007, the total mainline outstanding debt was $1.7 billion. For fiscal 2018, that amount has ballooned to $12.2 billion — more than seven times greater in just 11 years.

“All this borrowing has severely eroded the PTC’s financial position,” Gamrat cautions. “In fiscal 2018, the PTC had total assets of $8.9 billion and total liabilities of $14.5 billion for a total net position of a negative $5.6 billion.”

And, those rising tolls appear to have taken their toll as well. Growth, as measured by vehicle transactions, has been quite modest over the last decade. But, more importantly, revenue mile per commercial vehicle has fallen dramatically — by 12 percent — since fiscal 2008.

“Perhaps commercial vehicles are not able to pass along to their customers the increased cost of using the turnpike and may be finding alternatives to using the system,” Gamrat surmises.

Talk about a house of cards. The very poor decision to use toll money elsewhere not only has created a situation in which the Turnpike Commission must constantly raise tolls and keep borrowing to meet obligations, it also has created significant legal jeopardy that could force a wholesale redesign of transportation funding in the Keystone State.

To wit, the same group of truckers that successfully sued the State of New York for running afoul of federal law by misdirecting toll proceeds has filed suit against the Pennsylvania practice. The PTC has placed the money it’s supposed to be paying PennDOT into escrow pending the litigation’s resolution.

“What if federal courts find for the truckers again?” asks Gamrat. “Will they win back-tolls? And, how will the current governor and Legislature react regarding transportation funding?

“Needless to say, this lawsuit and possible ramifications of a ruling against the PTC will be extraordinarily important and will require close monitoring and analysis,” he concludes.


Colin McNickle is communications and marketing director at the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy ([email protected]).


Colin McNickle is communications and marketing director at the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy and can be reached via email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.