David Urban: Trump has kept his promise to revive manufacturing | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

David Urban: Trump has kept his promise to revive manufacturing

Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
President Trump is given an overview of Royal Dutch Shell’s ethane cracker plant in Monaca, Beaver County, Aug. 13.

My late father was a lifelong steelworker at J&L Steel’s famed Aliquippa works. Growing up in Western Pennsylvania, I was witness to politicians of every stripe too easily accepting the death of the American steel industry, and manufacturing in general. We were told that it was simply the way of the world in the 21st century for American industry to ship jobs off to China and other countries with fewer labor rights, weaker environmental regulations and practically no concept of “human rights.”

The most enthusiastic supporters of this “new normal” told us not to worry, assuring us that we wouldn’t miss those jobs — the backbone of our middle class for a century — once we got all those cheap, foreign-made goods. It didn’t matter that we strangled our own coal and steel industries with unworkable regulations, the globalists insisted, because we could just import goods from far-flung places.

The underlying message was that there was no point in fighting back and that American industrial decline was irreversible.

Enter Donald Trump. As I campaigned with the president in 2016, I couldn’t help but notice his critics looking down their noses at his promise to bring the American manufacturing sector back to life.

You can almost forgive them for thinking Trump’s vision of a brighter day for American workers was just pandering. When Trump took office in January 2017, hiring for manufacturing was virtually flat. The story of the last four decades has been dismal — a steady decline brought about by overregulation and continued offshoring.

Amazingly, under Trump, America has experienced a 2½-year manufacturing jobs boom. More Americans are now employed in well-paying manufacturing positions than before the Great Recession. The miracle hasn’t slowed. The latest jobs report continues to show robust manufacturing growth, with manufacturing job creation beating economists’ expectations, adding the most jobs since January.

Obviously, the rebound in American manufacturing didn’t happen magically; it came from Trump following through on his campaign promises — paring back job-killing regulations, cutting taxes on businesses and middle-class taxpayers, and implementing trade policies that protect American workers from foreign trade cheaters.

The steel industry alone has added nearly 5,000 net jobs since the beginning of Trump’s term, many of them right here in Western Pennsylvania.

Even the upper echelons of union leadership have finally noticed that Trump is usurping the Democratic Party’s long-held claim to represent the interests of working Americans.

In a recent meeting with representatives of the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, for instance, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka slammed Democrats for supporting anti-worker policies such as NAFTA and the disastrous Trans-Pacific Partnership.

That being said, I don’t believe union bosses are about to reverse 90 years of precedent and suddenly start endorsing Republicans. Nevertheless, what is noteworthy is Trumka’s admonition highlights an inconvenient truth — the Democratic Party no longer has anything of substance to offer America’s industrial workers.

There’s only one national political leader in America today who has followed through on his promises to working men and women, and he’s sitting in the White House. The political establishment initially laughed at Trump when he promised to revive American manufacturing, but now, less than three years later, it’s clear that Trump, and American workers, are getting the last laugh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.