Earl H. Tilford: MIA Day is missing in action | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Earl H. Tilford: MIA Day is missing in action


Presidential proclamation, along with decrees by state governors, has served to establish Sept. 20 as a national day of recognition for thousands of American service personnel who remain missing in action. Since World War II, over 81,000 Americans who served in that war, along with missing veterans from Cold War conflicts in Korea and Vietnam and the Persian Gulf, are among those for whom there is no final accounting. Indeed, this is nothing new, because since the dawn of history people have gone to war never to return — lost along with millions of civilians amid the debris of human conflicts from the Stone Age to the Information Age.

The recent POW/MIA Day went largely unnoticed amidst children marching in fear of global warming, politicians accusing other politicians of bad behavior and the ravages of floods. Last month, police officers in Tuscaloosa, Ala., and Mandeville, La., were added to the list of now 31 members of law enforcement killed since the first of the year. Amid the political hubbub and growing danger to law officers, there was scant notice of those still missing in action.

Most of America’s 81,000 missing in action are from World War II, for whom it is unlikely any accounting will ever be forthcoming, especially for those lost at sea or in remote areas in the Pacific. Missing soldiers from earlier wars going back to the American Revolution largely remain the purview of genealogists, archeologists and history buffs. Globally, there are millions of soldiers and civilians unaccounted for in the debris of wars since 1900.

It was the war in Vietnam that focused attention on the plight of Americans as POWs and those for whom there was no final accounting. The growing unpopularity of that war and the unique nature of a lot of the MIA combined to raise awareness. Many, certainly not all, of the American MIAs in Southeast Asia were aircrews, pilots, navigators and aircrew in military aircraft lost over Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.

Almost all the parents of those still missing from the Vietnam War are gone. So are many of their wives and siblings. The youngest children are now middle-age men and women who know their fathers only through photographs and stories. The oldest children are septuagenarians and will soon be gone.

The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, the Pentagon office tasked with finding our missing in action, employs relatively few individuals working on thousands of cases. Unfortunately, being a generation removed from the wars in Korea and Vietnam, few if any of these civil servants bring to the search the subtleties of knowledge and understanding.

Furthermore, conflating history with polemics has changed how we view and study the past. The recent controversy over Civil War statues is a case in point. Note that Bolsheviks destroyed the records of an unpleasant Russian imperial past. German Nazis contrived a mythical Aryan past to validate their horrific vision for a racially pure future. Both conflated elements of respective versions of political correctness with history. Having no history, Bolshevism and Nazism also had no future.

We need to remember our past, even the parts that seem remote. We need to honor and respect the past because it is a reliable guide to the future. That means honoring everyone who has served our country, including our former prisoners of war and those for whom there is no accounting.

Earl Tilford is a military historian and fellow for the Middle East & terrorism with the Institute for Faith and Freedom atGrove City College.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.