Editorial: Act 44 taking its toll on turnpike | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Act 44 taking its toll on turnpike

920145_web1_Turnpike
Tribune-Review
The Monroeville Interchange go the Pennsylvania Turnpike on Nov. 23, 2015.

On Thursday, state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale released an audit of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. The results were conclusive.

Where some states build bridges to nowhere or roads without a destination, Pennsylvania knows exactly where things for the toll road are headed. Down a path to bankruptcy.

Act 44 of 2007 demands the Turnpike Commission not just use the tolls it charges to support its own needs. Instead of taking all those dollars and cents and rolling them into road maintenance and support, the state demands a kickback. The commission has to pay $450 million a year to PennDOT to pay for mass transit.

Essentially, the turnpike is being strong-armed by a thug, paying a regular fee to the big boss. Act 44 doesn’t care if business has fallen off. The money just better be there when it’s time to pay up.

Right now, between paying that money to the state and trying to cover maintenance, the commission is $11.8 billion in debt. That’s a deeper hole than the state, with all its education expenses and police and the pensions and health care of 80,000 or so employees, has dug. But the commission hasn’t been able to kick the ball downhill, demanding someone else pay its bill.

Oh, wait. It has. It just hasn’t worked. While the commission has no choice in paying the state, the people who drive on the turnpike do have a choice, and more of them are opting not to use it.

With navigation apps and GPS devices, it’s easy to program a route that doesn’t require $56.50 to drive from Ohio to New Jersey. Commercial traffic on the road is down about 2 percent, and a federal court case filed by truckers calling the siphoning of toll money a violation of interstate commerce could blow up the whole operation.

But annual toll increases are still built into plans through 2044, meaning that a trip across the Keystone State could cost a big rig driver $400 in 20 years if something doesn’t change.

Harrisburg is trying to solve the problem it created. Nolan Ritchie, executive director of the Pennsylvania Senate Transportation Committee, said there are lots of ideas and they are “going to look at other states and how projects are funded for mass transit.”

Hopefully the next idea makes more sense than a mafia-movie shakedown scheme.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.