Editorial: Avenatti, Cohen, Kane, etc., show law hard for some lawyers | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Avenatti, Cohen, Kane, etc., show law hard for some lawyers

935702_web1_8b57806efcf94d9fa3d793e052db1a07-8b57806efcf94d9fa3d793e052db1a07-0
PennLive.com via AP
Former state Attorney General Kathleen Kane leaves court in handcuffs after her sentencing in 2016 at the Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown. Kane lost her law license a few months after she began a jail sentence for perjury, obstruction and other counts. On Friday, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued a disbarment order.

Maybe some lawyers spend so much time charting the routes between the rules, they forget that they are supposed to follow them.

A lot of legal eagles have been in big trouble for breaking the rules. On Monday, federal authorities in California arrested Michael Avenatti, the lawyer who became the face of Trump criticism as he represented porn star Stormy Daniels in her case against the president. Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to three years after pleading to crimes including setting up a Daniels payoff.

In Pennsylvania, we have no stones to throw. Last week, disgraced former attorney general Kathleen Kane was formally disbarred, which is probably the least of her concerns as she serves a 10- to 23-month sentence in Montgomery County for perjury and obstruction.

The root of her case was a grudge against Frank Fina, who prosecuted the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse case under her predecessor. The Disciplinary Board recommended public censure for Fina and former state Supreme Court justice Cynthia Baldwin for ethics violations during the case, in which Baldwin represented Penn State.

And then there is the Bedford County DA who resigned and admitted to trading sex for favors or the Philly DA who resigned and pleaded guilty in a bribery scandal or the former Centre County DA who lost her license for a year for texting judges and creating a fake Facebook page for spying.

Are rule-breaking lawyers the exception or the norm? An American Bar Association survey shows Pennsylvania has among the highest number of private disciplinary actions of reporting states.

The statistics say there are still a lot more good lawyers than the ones that grab the headlines, but often those are the ones making big things happen. Maybe a career of looking for loopholes and side doors and workarounds has led those lawyers — even the ones with good intentions — astray.

In Pennsylvania, lawyers are required to take two hours of ethics continuing education annually. The state’s website shows complicated issues, like “Ethics and Malpractice Avoidance” and “Social Media: Discovery, Ethics, Evidence and Sanctions.”

Maybe the problem is that it’s all too case- specific. There’s too much “what if,” too much leeway. Sometimes honesty requires a little less plausible deniability and integrity demands fewer gray areas. Maybe something more straightforward is needed.

Like “Ethics: Just Follow the Rules.”

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.