Editorial: Can communities combat crime? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Can communities combat crime?

1836106_web1_PoliceLightsZ

Four shot in Duquesne.

Standoff with armed man in Pittsburgh’s North Side.

Police seek man who fled Larimer shooting.

One dead and two injured in Wilkinsburg shooting.

And that was just Saturday and Sunday. Just in Allegheny County.

The hard truth is, crime is a consistent neighbor for many in the Greater Pittsburgh area.

Pittsburgh isn’t Detroit or Chicago. It’s not Philadelphia, but it still has too much happening that lands people in the hospital or in the morgue.

According to the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, in 2018 there were 92 criminal homicides in Allegheny County. There were 1,313 sex crimes and 1,024 robberies. There were 11,184 assaults and 160 arsons.

In a county of 1.2 million people, that means for every hundred people, more than one has been the victim of violent crime.

True, in the city and county of Philadelphia, with a population of 1.58 million, the numbers more than double to 2.5 violent crimes per hundred people. But knowing how much worse a situation could be isn’t a reason to be content with how bad it is.

The knife crimes in August in Downtown Pittsburgh provoked questions. A rash of gun crimes in May and June alarmed New Kensington residents.

The problem is that there isn’t one person to find to stop the crime. It isn’t a serial stabber or rogue gunman. The issue is that crime is a virus and too many people have picked up the disease.

Nationwide, crime rates are down and Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto has pointed to lower numbers locally, too, but when it comes to violent crime, the numbers are never low enough.

So what do we do?

More and more small municipalities in Pennsylvania are shuttering their police departments and handing the responsibility to the state police as they try to provide the services they have to with limited number of tax dollars. That’s unfortunate because local police — perhaps from more consolidated departments — are a vital and irreplaceable part of staying safe.

A New York University research group found that another way to reduce crime was to increase the amount of programs in the community. Sociology professor Patrick Sharkey found that investments in things like housing, community centers and parks in a community brought a stability that lowered crime numbers.

The best thing about this idea is that it can start in every neighborhood with the simple catalyst of people who care.

If we had one violent crime per 100 people last year, what could an equal response in positive community programs accomplish?

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.