Editorial: Casey’s call for DNC debate makes electoral sense | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Casey’s call for DNC debate makes electoral sense

1057355_web1_CaseyRun

U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, is right. The Democratic Party should hold one of what promises to be a plethora of primary debates in Pennsylvania.

The Keystone State will undoubtedly be a keystone in the 2020 presidential election. It usually is.

Americans have gone to the polls to pick a president 58 times. In Pennsylvania, the citizens voted for the winner 48 times. In fact, there was an 80-year stretch where the man who moved into the White House always won Pennsylvania.

Today, there is a fervent need to paint a color on that vote. Is Pennsylvania a red state or a blue state?

No, as is fitting for the state that houses Independence Hall and was American liberty’s nursery, Pennsylvania is more headstrong than that and likes to make up its own mind.

Pennsylvania voted for Trump and Obama. It pinballs from Democrat to Republican, even being one of the few states that ever gave its electoral votes to another party, choosing Teddy Roosevelt’s Progressive Party over Democrat Woodrow Wilson in 1912.

Pennsylvania is the ultimate swing state, blowing with the winds of the election and ending up on the winning side 83% of the time.

So why wouldn’t the ever-expanding pool of contenders for the Democratic nomination want a shot at the Pennsylvanian electorate?

Debates are already planned for both Miami and Detroit. Florida’s 29 electoral votes and Michigan’s 16 both went to Trump in 2016 along with Pennsylvania’s 20. The other large swing pools the president picked up were in Ohio and Wisconsin.

With 12 debates planned, there is also a good chance that Milwaukee or Madison and one of the big “C” cities in Ohio could be on the table. So could Indiana as South Bend’s Mayor Pete Buttigieg is contending in balance of Vice President Mike Pence, the former governor.

So Casey is absolutely right in his letter to the Democratic National Committee pushing for a Pennsylvania debate.

And yet it probably didn’t need to be said at all. The DNC certainly understands electoral maps and electoral math, 2016 mistakes notwithstanding. It is hard to believe they don’t also want an early and well-placed campaign commercial for whomever gets promoted from candidate to nominee.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.