ShareThis Page
Editorial: Cohen latest cage match over winners and losers | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Cohen latest cage match over winners and losers

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, February 27, 2019 3:30 p.m.
810008_web1_808666-e251757f993a4af1afd14a22fb5f27d0
AP
Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal lawyer, testifies before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday.

“He is all about winning.”

Michael Cohen made that statement to the House Oversight Committee Wednesday. It was an indictment of the actions of the president.

It doesn’t really matter if you believe Cohen or not. It doesn’t matter if you support President Trump or not.

Because Cohen’s statement doesn’t have to start and stop with Trump.

Right now, everyone is all about winning.

The American political landscape has degenerated into a kind of ultimate fighting. If MMA cage matches are a no-holds-barred attempt to physically dominate your opponent inside a squared circle, a congressional committee hearing has become something similar — a way to use words, perspectives, agendas, spin-doctoring and legal artistry to be the last man standing.

And the casualty is not the person being faced. It’s not Nancy Pelosi or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It’s not Sarah Huckabee Sanders or Kellyanne Conway. It’s not Mitch McConnell and it’s not Chuck Schumer. It’s no one who is actually playing the game.

It’s the truth. It’s the honor we are supposed to accord the process. It’s the respect that people have traditionally given to their leaders.

Both parties have the same playbook. Decry the other side. Be shocked at their behavior. Question the rules. Accuse them of bad faith.

Whatever you do, don’t do what the late Sen. John McCain did and admit openly and honestly that your opponent is a good person who just has different ideas. Don’t work with someone from the other side because you believe in a common goal. Don’t do anything that isn’t, first and foremost, a win for your side.

And when that happens, it creates an atmosphere where everything is perceived through that cynical, win-at-all-costs lens.

The indignation and affront from the committee Republicans was a mirror image of the Democratic reactions during the Senate confirmation hearings for Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

It has to stop somewhere, because if everything is about winning over truth and partisanship over reality, people are dragged further and further from the things that ground us. They are pulled from facts and separated from trust.

Because when everything is about winning, we all lose.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.