Editorial: College athletes are pros | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: College athletes are pros

1754631_web1_GTR-PittFB-7-080319
Pitt wide receiver Tre Tipton at a practice in August.

As the idea of college athletes getting paychecks on top of their scholarships gets kicked around in California and now in Pennsylvania, the attention tends to focus on the stars and the National College Athletic Association.

The NCAA, after all, makes the rules. The sports oversight organization that calls all the shots, it is simultaneously the team owner, a player and a referee in this game.

It also controls the box office, picking up tons of money marketing the sports that student athletes play. In March 2018, the NCAA’s reported earnings topped $1 billion. Not bad for a non-profit organization, but then most charities don’t have broadcast deals for football and basketball in markets from sea to shining sea.

At the same time, the NCAA says the kids playing the games that earn that money can’t get more than those scholarships, despite the fact that some superstars are pulling in the fans. And those students — especially the ones in non-marquee sports — have to fulfill class and training obligations that can prevent them from taking on a job to make ends meet. That’s ridiculous considering they already have what could be a well-paying job.

So the fact that some students would like a cut of that isn’t surprising. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law Monday that would let student athletes earn money, make deals and hire agents. Pennsylvania state Reps. Dan Miller, D-Mt. Lebanon, and Ed Gainey, D-Lincoln-Lemington, say they plan to introduce a similar proposal.

That will no doubt be good for the students who can make the deals, but is it best for student athletes as a group?

Maybe instead of more money going into more pockets in college sports, we need more people remembering the student half of student athletics. Far more student athletes leave school without a pro career on the horizon than those who sign NFL or NBA contracts.

Students need to be protected from exploitation, whether by schools or the NCAA, and focus should remain on having marketable skills that don’t involve running fast or catching a ball. And if there is a shortfall between what a scholarship covers and a student’s living expenses, well, maybe that $1 billion NCAA revenue could help bridge the gap.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.