Editorial: Colt’s AR-15 decision is market driven | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Colt’s AR-15 decision is market driven

1702848_web1_vnd-gunbill02-032519
AR-15 rifles on display Saturday, March 23, 2019 at The Shooters Bench in West Deer.

Guns aren’t just about hunting or target shooting or personal defense. They aren’t just about firepower.

They are also about money.

According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, it’s big money. The total economic impact of the gun industry topped $52 billion in 2018. Nationwide, there are 311,991 jobs related to building and selling guns, ammunition and supplies.

In Pennsylvania alone, there are more than 12,500 industry jobs pulling in $655 million in paychecks. Guns have a $2 billion economic impact in the Keystone State.

That is why Thursday’s announcement by Colt that the 172-year-old company is suspending production of the AR-15 for civilian markets can’t just be viewed through the lens of a very fraught political climate and an atmosphere alarmed by mass murders.

It has to be seen as a business decision.

Colt says the market is saturated with the AR-15 and similar weapons. It says consumer demand has changed. It says there is a need to be filled, but right now, that is for police and military weapons.

The numbers do back that up. While the industry’s revenues are growing, that growth has slowed considerably. Economic impact went up 169% between 2008 and 2016, but only 0.98% in the past two years.

For Colt — a company just three years out of bankruptcy and facing a wrongful-death lawsuit with fellow manufacturers over the 2017 Las Vegas massacre — that slowdown probably feels like rolling backward.

It might say that gun control activists have argued their case to both the industry and the American public, pushing the narrative that the AR-15 is a weapon whose place is in exactly the hands where Colt will be working to place them, those of professionals trained to use them.

It might also show that consumers are more receptive to limits than legislators — if enough of the rifles remain in supply for a major weapons manufacturer to turn attention elsewhere.

When legislative solutions are proposed for problems, often the response is to let the marketplace sort it out.

Could that be what is happening?

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.