Editorial: Congress not unbiased jury in impeachment | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Congress not unbiased jury in impeachment

U.S. Rep. Conor Lamb.

A jury has been seated for the trial of Rahmael Holt in the November 2017 shooting death of New Kensington police Officer Brian Shaw, slated to start Monday.

The jury selection took days. In any such process, there are questions about whether jurors knew the defendant or the deceased. There are questions about bias and an ability to be impartial. There is an attempt on both sides to make sure that the 12 people who hear the case are able to make a decision after hearing the evidence, not before.

It would be nice if Congress was like that.

On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted on the rules for the impeachment probe regarding President Trump. The procedures passed, by a vote of 232 to 196. For those doing the counting, there are 234 Democrats in the House, 197 Republicans and one independent.

The party-line vote came as a surprise to almost no one. It shouldn’t. Most congressmen have already made their positions clear and are on record calling for impeachment, calling for the investigation, or opposing it.

The Senate is no different. That’s where the 53 Republicans hold the gavel over the 45 Democrats and two independents who caucus with them. They are just as loud in their support or opposition.

Few in either chamber have been like Rep. Conor Lamb, D-Mt. Lebanon, who issued a statement saying his vote only pertained to outlining the rules.

“I have not made any decision about impeachment, nor will I until all the evidence is in,” he said.

If the Senate is the jury in an impeachment, the House is the grand jury that decides if there should be a trial at all.

With that in mind, members of Congress should keep their mouths shut and their minds open as the evidence comes in so that their votes can be trusted to be grounded in reality and not partisanship when they are cast.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.