Editorial: Could Congress vote conscience over caucus? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Could Congress vote conscience over caucus?

1422532_web1_CongressNew116

“Our Independent Voice.”

That’s how a Bucks County congressman’s official website describes him.

It takes digging on Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick’s website to uncover his GOP affiliation. You can find that he’s a former FBI agent and an attorney, a CPA and an EMT. It shows he is on his second term and his committee assignments. But on the main page, the party names appear only in a day-old tweet.

“The Hatfield versus McCoy brand of politics must end. Democrats and Republicans need to start treating each other respectfully and like human beings. We are all created in the image and likeness of God,” he wrote.

It’s a narrow path Fitzpatrick negotiates in his tweet and on that page. He tries hard not to offend his constituents, not to offend his party and not to stand openly against the president. With that one word — independent — he doesn’t so much take a stand as keep his distance.

It makes one wonder if he may be following in the footsteps of his Michigan colleague, Rep. Justin Amash, who recently left the Republican Party, declaring himself an independent on Independence Day.

Fitzpatrick, like Amash, voted Tuesday to rebuke President Trump for racist tweets about four congresswomen. Fitzpatrick was one of only four Republicans who stood with the Democratic majority.

That was a stand, and one that will not be forgotten by either party and certainly not by the president.

But the question is: Was it a stand against Trump’s tweets and their hotly debated meaning?

Or maybe Fitzpatrick was taking a stand for something both parties seem to have abandoned in recent years — the ability and responsibility to think for yourself, putting what is best for your constituents and conscience ahead of caucus and command structure.

Independence used to be something that America celebrated, and it wasn’t that long ago that it was seen as a reason to cleave to a candidate. It was why we were supposed to vote for John McCain. It was the selling point for the Trump campaign.

But now all Republicans are expected to march in lockstep. Democrats are pulling themselves apart trying to decide if the party line is a more winnable middle road or a more energizing left lane.

What if everyone just honestly said what they thought, put forth ideas they believed in and voted for what they felt was right, without checking with the person in charge to see what the vote was supposed to be?

That’s how the Constitution was written and why we don’t have a Declaration of Control.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.