Editorial: Education needs a better charter | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Education needs a better charter

1539511_web1_ClassroomSeats

What is a charter?

It’s the authorization by which something comes into being.

William Penn was given a charter for the land that became Pennsylvania. It was the Charter of Liberties that he later granted the state’s first ruling body in 1701 that took Penn’s Woods from being his holding to being its own entity.

A charter is meant to define parameters and breathe life into an idea. It’s not meant to be the lightning bolt that animates Frankenstein’s monster. Pennsylvania’s charter and cyber charter schools have used their charters both ways.

There are good charter schools — schools that teach kids things they would never learn in a traditional public school because of demands those schools have to satisfy.

A good charter school starts with a plan that defines exactly why they have a different idea for education and what could make it work. It might be an arts focus, or an emphasis on languages and culture. It might be about science, or it might be about an innovative teaching method.

But there are also bad charter schools. There are schools that don’t have a framework beyond acquiring as much money as possible while spending as little as possible in return.

And in the middle there are charter schools that are less good or bad than they are unfocused and undefined. They are run on the premise that they don’t want to suffer the problems of public schools but without much direction beyond that.

Charter schools, in short, are a metaphor for politics. There are good ideas, bad ideas and a lot that sound good but have no vision to make them work.

So, good for Gov. Tom Wolf for taking on the lack of accountability and transparency that allow bad and mediocre charter schools to give the good ones a bad name. The governor said Tuesday he wanted to reform charters through a mix of proposed legislation and executive orders.

But let’s hope Wolf is working with a solid charter himself, some kind of plan with what needs to be fixed and what doesn’t.

The best way to reform charter schools is to make them obsolete by improving traditional public schools so that those are the places people want their kids to spend their days — places where students learn skills that will carry them through life and help them reach today’s goals as well as tomorrow’s.

Maybe the perfect reform is to give public schools a better charter.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.