Editorial: Firefighter support is priceless | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Firefighter support is priceless

1639202_web1_FireTruckA

Putting out a fire isn’t cheap.

According to the International Association of Fire Chiefs, that iconic helmet is $350. Goggles are $75. The hood that goes under the hat is $45, and that’s the cheapest thing they wear. The jacket and pants are $1,800, gloves are $75 and boots are $450. All of that pales next to the breathing apparatus that comes in at $6,500.

Altogether, that’s about $9,400, and it doesn’t count the tools a firefighter uses, like an ax or a flashlight or a radio.

That’s for just one person, and it’s not exactly an area where you want to cut corners. That equipment isn’t just the difference between life and death for the person who wears it. It’s life and death for the people who need to be saved, too.

Then there’s a truck, which might cost $100,000 for a small brush truck or $500,000 for a pumper or even $1 million for a completely outfitted aerial truck, the kind that might be needed to fight big fires in tall buildings.

None of it is cheap.

That is why Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale’s recommendation to loosen the ropes that tie up state money to help fire departments has merit.

State aid money from a tax on fire insurance premiums from out-of-state companies generated $55 million for more than 2,500 municipalities in 2018. DePasquale says some of the relief associations that receive that money have accumulated large fund balances because of restrictions on how the money can be used.

Local companies have had big balances. In 2016, Monroeville had $2.7 million. In 2017, Greensburg had $3.7 million.

Companies that have those cushions say the rules aren’t that restrictive and the banked funds are there for a reason — like when they need one of those big-ticket trucks.

Both sides can be right. Maybe the restrictions are like the protective gear the firefighters wear, something that insulates them from the heat some companies feel when funds are low.

But others might have needs that aren’t on the state’s approved list of what the funds can provide. They might require a way to grab the state’s attention to ask for a little latitude, a kind of flashing red light to clear the road.

So maybe less regulation isn’t the answer, but a tweak could be — something that could help bring in more firefighters and make sure they have what they need to do a job that is priceless.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.