Editorial: First responders need protection | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: First responders need protection


A firefighter has to be prepared for a lot.

Fire, naturally. Structural damage to a house. The elements, since emergencies don’t put themselves off for fair weather. Even access to simple life-sustaining oxygen.

And bullets.

That last one shouldn’t be a factor, but it is.

Jeannette firefighters are being outfitted with body armor because of the risk of violence. The department’s relief association is spending $13,000 to supply vests for 15 volunteers while the city pays for three more for three full-time paid firefighters.

It is tragic, but firefighters are going into situations where the risk demands preparation, just like wearing a jacket that will withstand flames and a respirator to breathe despite the smoke.

In September and October, Jeannette firefighters responded to fatal shooting incidents. They show up for drug overdoses and other medical situations. They respond to calls that involve domestic disturbances that can get rapidly out of hand. They need to be prepared, and they need to be protected.

And Jeannette is not alone. The dangerous situations present themselves everywhere.

In May, a Wisconsin firefighter was killed when a man he had just revived shot him. In October, an Oklahoma firefighter was wounded by ammunition that was set off in a fire.

Other first responders face similar challenges. Paramedics and emergency medical responders head into dangerous situations to render aid. The Centers for Disease Control tracks injuries to emergency medical service providers. Of 21,200 instances in 2017, 3,500 were because of violence. That’s about one injury in every six.

It’s another reason that we have to be willing to prioritize proper support for our first responders.

Our first line of defense has to be protected. Our safety depends on it. And they deserve it.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.