Editorial: Myles Garrett’s helmet strike on Steelers QB should be investigated | TribLIVE.com
Editor's Picks

Editorial: Myles Garrett’s helmet strike on Steelers QB should be investigated

David Richard/AP
Cleveland Browns defensive end Myles Garrett hits Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph with a helmet, Nov. 14.
Cleveland Browns defensive end Myles Garrett, left, gets ready to hit Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph, second from left, with a helmet during the second half of an NFL football game Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, in Cleveland. The Browns won 21-7.

It is easy to dismiss some post-game howling as poor sportsmanship.

That call was blown! The refs were biased! The game was rigged!

It so often comes down to the fact that one side won and the other side lost. Identify yourself so closely with a team and it can be hard not to have that feel like a personal attack.

But sometimes the howling is justified. Sometimes there was poor sportsmanship. Sometimes it actually was a personal attack.

Mason Rudolph signed on with the Pittsburgh Steelers to do a job and play a game. Football has risks of violent physical contact. It also has rules and regulators because of those risks. The players must depend on the enforcement of those rules when they are broken. It can literally be the difference between life and death or serious, career-ending injury.

Myles Garrett agreed to those rules when he signed on with the Cleveland Browns. He broke them in spectacular, contemptuous, public fashion when he assaulted — and that is the only word for the incident — Rudolph in Thursday night’s win over the Steelers.

If anyone were to go into the workplace of an opponent for a rival business, pick up a tool of their trade and violently smash at their head with that computer or hammer or frying pan, the police would be right to investigate and the district attorney would be right to file charges.

The Browns, the NFL and especially law enforcement in Ohio should be taking a close, serious look at what happened when Garrett slammed Rudolph to the ground, ripped the quarterback’s helmet off and struck him in the head.

There are multiple reasons this was flagrantly against the rules of the game. It should also be obvious that it is against the law as well. Not only did Garrett strip away a piece of equipment designed to prevent the potentially devastating head injuries of football, he then used it as a weapon to deliver a blow to that unprotected head.

And the NFL should encourage outside authorities to investigate. Players have become used to receiving large dollar-amount fines and suspensions. Maybe the only way to drive home the point in this case is with a penalty more serious than half the distance to the goal.

Because if Rudolph was seriously injured in that attack, there would be no way to rewind the clock and replay with lost yardage. The damage would have been done.

Games have rules. So does life. And everybody has to play by them.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.