ShareThis Page
Editorial: Gas tax covers police for areas that won’t | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Gas tax covers police for areas that won’t

1078894_web1_ptr-gasprices-122512

Pennsylvanians pay 57.6 cents per gallon in gas tax, the highest in the country. With prices ranging from $2.94 to $3.15, that means about 18% to 20% of what we pay at the pump isn’t paying for what goes into the tank.

It goes to Harrisburg, where it’s supposed to pay for the roads we travel. Fill up a 20-gallon tank, and you’re supposed to be putting $11.52 into building, improving, maintaining or fixing roads, or keeping the bridges from crumbling into the rivers.

That’s not just what we assume happens. That is what the state constitution says that money is to support.

But state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale’s latest deep dive shows that the money’s being collected, but it’s not all going where it should.

DePasquale didn’t find fraud or theft. He found money diverted to other areas, including $2.45 billion that went to the Pennsylvania State Police for coverage of areas where cops aren’t provided by municipalities.

It is a good thing that people in those areas are kept safe. That’s not the issue.

The issue is that townships and boroughs are choosing not to provide protection and allowing that responsibility to fall on the state, and therefore, on all Pennsylvania taxpayers.

They say they can’t afford it, and in a lot of small or poor areas, that makes sense. But state police have estimated that just over half of our municipalities aren’t providing police. That adds up, and everyone pays the bill.

There has been resistance to Gov. Tom Wolf’s proposed solution — a per capita annual fee that would cover the cost without raiding the gas tax coffers. For a small borough with less than 2,000 people, that would be $8 apiece. For Hempfield Township, with 42,300 residents, it would be $166 per person.

No one wants to pay more. But you want what you’re already paying for. Fill up once a week, and you are paying about $600 a year for safe roads and bridges while only part is going there.

Areas that choose not to have local police can’t have it both ways. They can’t claim they are doing it to spare taxpayers when we are all paying for it at the pump and with every busted rim and broken strut that could have been avoided if the roads were repaired.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.