ShareThis Page
Editorial: Gun owners, opponents need to read the room |

Editorial: Gun owners, opponents need to read the room

| Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:45 a.m

Situational awareness.

It’s the idea that you should be aware of what’s happening around you. It’s why Secret Service agents scan rooms and note all the people in them. It’s why many law enforcement officers won’t sit with their back turned to a door or window.

It’s what Shawn Thomas thinks people should practice more in their daily lives. He’s probably right.

Thomas is one of the organizers of Monday’s gun rights rally in Pittsburgh, where hundreds, many carrying legal weapons, gathered to protest Mayor Bill Peduto’s proposed gun restrictions on things like semi-automatic rifles and some ammunition and firearms accessories within the city.

People should be more aware of what is going on around them. Everyone.

People should watch where they are going, be cognizant of the dangers that exist in this parking lot or that street. They should pay attention to who is behind them and who is in front. They should do what they can to keep themselves from harm.

But there are other situations, like the alarming nationwide instances of mass murder by an individual with a grudge and a gun.

That doesn’t mean that we have to obliterate the right to bear arms, but if we are going to be aware of our situations, we have to do more than read the room. We have to read the writing on the wall, and frequently that writing is in blood.

Could Pittsburgh’s proposal constitute improper overreach? Yes, it could. That was likely why the announcement wasn’t made by Peduto alone, but in concert with the governor and legislators, who could change that on a state level. That doesn’t change the potential Bill of Rights issue which is still a valid concern.

But chants of “we will not comply” from an armed crowd, and a shout of “Come and take it, Bill” don’t show situational awareness.

Situational awareness demands that we look at the challenges that surround us and find the best, safest way to resolve them, and most police officers will tell you that pulling a weapon is their last resort.

Situational awareness would have us realistically assess dangers and approach them in a way that would minimize them, or suggest we remove ourselves from the situation.

And if the Pittsburgh leaders proposing the changes are wrong, situational awareness would make answers and open minds the right weapons to pack. Bring more than a loaded gun to the table. Bring an idea and share it and participate in a conversation about how to make things better and help people survive the peaceful act of a Saturday prayer.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.