Editorial: Harrisburg targets hunting changes | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Harrisburg targets hunting changes


It used to be that the Saturday after Thanksgiving was about hunting for bargains or hunting for Christmas ornaments or maybe just hunting for the remote to watch college football.

“Used to be” was last year. That changes this weekend.

This year, the Saturday after Thanksgiving is also the first day of deer season. After more than 50 years, Pennsylvania hunters’ routines will be shaken up. No Monday start with those first precious days taken off work or school to sit in the woods on a cold morning waiting for the perfect 12-point buck.

Saturday’s activities will be followed by a lull as Sunday hunting remains off limits. For now.

On Wednesday, Gov. Tom Wolf signed a law allowing hunting on three Sundays in 2020 — one each during rifle and archery seasons and another to be named by the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

It’s seen by some as a great move that makes hunting more accessible to people with Monday-to- Friday jobs.

State Sen. Jim Brewster, D-McKeesport, the Senate Game and Fisheries Committee minority chairman, sees it as a way to bring in new hunters and keep them engaged. And it could be.

Let’s hope that it is, because hunting is more than just a big part of Pennsylvania culture, especially in more rural areas. Managing the herd in the absence of enough natural predators is important. And it’s a nice chunk of the state’s recreation and tourism economy.

A study from the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership showed that hunters pumped about $817 million into their sport in the state in 2016, and the hunters that spend the most are the ones that hunt big game.

The most popular big game in Pennsylvania is the state animal — the white-tailed deer. According to Penn State, there are about 1.5 million in the commonwealth, or 30 per square mile, although anyone driving at night might swear there are more.

But state government seems to enjoy assuming something will work and moving on to the next step before waiting to see how it plays out first. Gambling has grown steadily since gaining a toehold. Marijuana is poised to do the same.

Why couldn’t the Sunday hunting question have waited to be settled until after the change to a Saturday start was assessed? Was there really a pressing need to decide the issue this year?

Let’s hope moving that first day works well — the starting over the holiday weekend catches the deer by surprise and leads to record hauls that excite and entice young hunters to get involved and keep spending their time and money in Pennsylvania. And let’s hope that next year, the prospect of those three Sunday hunts does the same.

But while we’re at it, maybe we could also hope that the state government and lawmakers can learn to finish shooting at one target before moving on to the next.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.