Editorial: Highlands shouldn’t appeal Open Records ruling | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Highlands shouldn’t appeal Open Records ruling

1187458_web1_-vnd-highlands1-021219
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Highlands Superintendent Monique Mawhinney, acknowledges that the district has room to improve, and that it is a work in progress, during a public meeting earlier this year at Highlands High School.

Just because you can doesn’t mean that you should.

You can eat your co-worker’s unattended hoagie. You shouldn’t.

You can steal your neighbor’s newspaper out of his driveway. You shouldn’t.

You can paint your house PennDOT orange. You really, really shouldn’t.

And yes, Highlands School District, you absolutely can appeal the April 30 decision of the state’s Office of Open Records that said the Tribune-Review was right and the name of the employee the board suspended in February should be released.

But you shouldn’t file that appeal.

You have made it plain with your repeated actions that you believe the rules don’t apply at Highlands. You believe the Sunshine Act is a dim bulb you can flick off at will. You choose to keep secret any information you want, despite legal requirements to the contrary.

And you do it knowingly.

While you have three times in three months suspended and then fired anonymous employees, you have been advised each time that your actions were wrong. You still did it again.

But now it isn’t just a newspaper calling you on your error. It’s not just the people who live and work and pay taxes in the school district. It’s the state itself. And you still don’t care about “should.”

We know you don’t because this appeal is pointless. Why fight to keep secret a name that is already public?

The employee is known, although the name was not released officially. District Solicitor Ira Weiss confirmed special education teacher Andrew B. Kotyk was the employee placed on unpaid leave in February and paid a $31,202 settlement.

So why the appeal, Highlands? You lost on paper — and in the paper. You lost in practice. Why continue to waste taxpayer money on an appeal of a moot point?

These are the kind of questions we would like you to answer openly and in public. They are the kind of questions the Sunshine Act demands you answer via clear and freely available information for any red-blooded American who wants to know. And you can. You know all the answers and we are here to listen.

But you, Highlands, choose not to do that. Even though you should.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.