Editorial: How do you ask charities for charity? | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: How do you ask charities for charity?

The Cathedral of Learning at the University of Pittsburgh.

Charity begins at home, and Allegheny County is home to a lot of charities.

After six years, the county has only been able to review 72 percent of the tax-exempt properties owned by “complex nonprofits.” Out of 2,800 parcels, about 700 have not been reviewed to see if they really should be tax exempt, or if they should be required to pump up to $25 million into the county’s budget, and millions more into schools and municipalities.

One of those is the City of Pittsburgh, which some big-budget nonprofits call home. UPMC alone has net assets of $1.9 billion, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. Throw in UPMC Senior Communities and that’s another $45 million.

That doesn’t count Highmark or its affiliated hospitals, or Pitt or Carnegie Mellon or any of the other universities. It doesn’t touch on church assets or museums. Look at a tax map of the city or the county and you find a lot of well-situated real estate that doesn’t get a tax bill.

A lot of that is for the good. Charities, after all, serve an important role in our society. They fill the gaps that are left in providing care for the poor, comfort to the sick, education to better ourselves and art to uplift us. What government fails to do, charities choose to do.

But if too many of our businesses are charities, that leaves us in an unfortunate position. The taxes have to be paid by somebody, and if the groups that own all those big, expensive buildings don’t have to pay taxes on them to pave and plow the streets and provide police protection, that responsibility is going to fall on the people who own the taxable structures. Hello, little guy.

The county has been trying to find a Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) balance with UPMC, Highmark, Pitt and CMU, and Mayor Bill Peduto’s “One Pittsburgh” initiative looks to get commitments from them and others to coordinate giving up to $50 million a year on dozens of projects.

But they don’t have to participate. Those 700 unfinished property reviews show more than a lack of manpower and time. They show a lack of political power. The county can’t force the nonprofits to the negotiating table and neither can Pittsburgh, and if the city can’t, smaller municipalities and school boards are definitely out of luck.

All of it leaves the public entities — and the taxpayers they represent — with a hand out, asking the charities for spare change.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.