Editorial: How much surveillance is too much? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: How much surveillance is too much?

1717821_web1_ptr-nalaniupdate009-090419
Courtesy of Allegheny County Police Department
The Allegheny County Police Department on Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2019, released this surveillance photo allegedly showing Sharena I. Nancy on Saturday, Aug. 31, 2019, at a Sheetz in Murrysville.

Someone is always watching.

That might sound a little crazy, but you’re only paranoid if it’s not true. These days, everything is being monitored all the time.

It’s not that someone can swoop in and stop you from doing something illegal or saying something inciteful. It’s that if something does happen, a network of electronic eyes can find out what happened when.

Your phone can be tracked by its GPS chip to find out where you have been. A digital record of your phone contacts and social media statements can reconstruct your day. Check-ins at restaurants, the scan of your E-ZPass. Your day can be a cyber “Hansel and Gretel” story following your invisible trail back to the gingerbread house.

Sometimes that’s creepy. Like when you get email or Facebook ads for something you were just thinking about or talking about with a friend. How does Amazon know?

Sometimes it’s disturbing. Do you really want to think about what the National Security Agency might think about that tweet to your college roommate? Do you want to pull punches in an email to your sister because someone might misunderstand? Is that kind of self-editing necessary in a post-9/11 world?

And sometimes, it is true, it can be a benefit.

When you call for an ambulance, you can get help even without a word because the call can be traced.

The body of Penn Hills toddler Nalani Johnson was found by tracing the cellphone of accused killer Sharena Nancy, according to police.

Baldwin Borough and Castle Shannon police are among the 400 departments who are working with Ring video doorbell cameras, an Amazon company, to use footage to solve crimes.

Now supervisors in Fawn are asking residents to voluntarily register surveillance cameras to help enforce rules in the community, like illegal dumping.

“Video captured by trail cameras and home surveillance can be valuable evidence for law enforcement,” said state police spokesman Ryan Tarkowski.

It is obvious that surveillance has a lot of pros, and they are things we don’t mind when we all agree on the outcome. Catch a murderer. Stop a crime. Save a life.

But we have to be careful that we don’t catch more than criminals when we cast a wide cybernet, and we need to make sure our leaders — local, state and national — know exactly where we want those invisible lines drawn.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.