Editorial: Is Marsy’s Law necessary? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Is Marsy’s Law necessary?

1774472_web1_WEB-scales-of-justice2

Victims should not be forgotten in the criminal justice process.

It is easy to reduce the court system to criminal and prosecutor — crime and punishment.

Marsy’s Law is being proposed as an amendment to Pennsylvania’s constitution. It is a crime victims’ rights amendment that legislators and advocates say provides enforcement of rights that have been previously spelled out for victims.

“This provides a mechanism for victims to motion the court to ensure their rights are enforced,” said Pennsylvania Victim Advocate Jennifer Storm.

Victims should have a voice in the process. They need to be heard, they need to be consulted and they need to be remembered as the wheels of justice continue to turn. They should be heard at sentencing, and they should be heard at parole and probation hearings. They should know when someone is being released. They need information and attention.

But the law cannot forget that until there is a conviction, the defendant is accused of a crime. There may not yet be proof that a crime has been committed at all, much less who committed it.

Marsy’s Law is named after the sister of Henry J. Nicholas III, a California billionaire. Marsy was stalked and murdered. Nicholas has committed himself to making sure that victims like his sister have the voice she didn’t have, and that is a noble and admirable goal.

It cannot, however, be allowed to take precedence over the criminal justice process.

Duquesne University law professor and Pennsylvania constitutional law scholar Bruce Ledewitz said much of Marsy’s Law is already being done in the state and could have less positive impact than believed.

“I would have rather seen the Legislature come up with money for victim services rather than the hubbub of passing a meaningless constitutional amendment,” he said.

Pennsylvania has a Crime Victims Act that has been on the books for more than 20 years. It could definitely use some updates and maybe do with the addition of some teeth to enforce its growl.

But changing that act seems both easier and more effective than amending the constitution.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.