ShareThis Page
Editorial: Is record casino revenue enough? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Is record casino revenue enough?

Tribune-Review
| Friday, January 18, 2019 4:42 p.m
653735_web1_gtr-gamblingrecord-011719
A Rivers Casino employee reaches for chips at a roulette table at Rivers Casino on the North Shore on Nov. 17, 2016.

What is $3.2 billion?

It’s $10 for every human being in the United States.

It’s enough to bridge most of the gap between Congress and President Trump on the border wall.

In short, it’s a lot of money. And it’s how much money was made at Pennsylvania casinos in 2018.

Yes, it’s a record. It topped the previous record from 2017 by $21 million, which is, incidentally, about $1.75 more per Pennsylvanian. The state is now second only to Nevada in casino revenue. Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh brought in $76 million last year. Meadows Casino in Washington brought in $35.7 million.

But is the escalation what we need?

Obviously, we want a $3.2 billion industry in Pennsylvania. We want those jobs. We want those paychecks. We want the people who win money at slot machines and table games to turn around and spend their windfalls in local restaurants and stores, buying cars in our dealerships and staying in our hotels. We want that.

There’s a balance, though.

How much money did Pennsylvanians lose to see that revenue? Plenty of people come from surrounding states to play here, but we know plenty of that money is just recirculating from the locals.

We know that since gambling is here now, and gambling is profitable, it’s not going to go away. But how far do we let it go and how fast?

We already started with casinos and slot machines, which led to table games, which led to more casinos, which led to sports betting and online gaming and mini casinos, like the one planned for the Westmoreland Mall.

The space at the mall is available, incidentally, because Bon-Ton closed, as have plenty of other stores in and around area shopping centers.

Why have they closed? Many retailers have learned the lesson that growing too big too fast isn’t sustainable. Even powerhouses like Starbucks and Krispy Kreme — and if anything is as easy to sell as “free” money, it’s sugared up coffee and hot donuts — have closed stores that mushroomed in expansion booms that outpaced what they could handle.

So maybe $3.2 billion isn’t a signpost pushing Pennsylvania to aim for $4 billion or $10 billion or more.

Maybe $3.2 billion is enough to stop and smell the donuts before greenlighting anything else.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.