ShareThis Page
Editorial: Is restoring Pennsylvania enough? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Is restoring Pennsylvania enough?

1271396_web1_GTR-WolfHere06-060719

“Restore Pennsylvania” is a good concept. Pennsylvania could use a little restoration. That’s not a revelation.

Pennsylvania needs more jobs. It needs more business. It needs more industry. It needs more development.

But Gov. Tom Wolf’s push to take $4.5 billion in severance tax that could be generated from Marcellus shale drilling and invest it in projects, including community blight, sounds familiar because it’s nothing new. It reuses the severance tax idea Wolf has talked about for years and recycles something every city, borough and township in the state struggles with — the empty storefronts and abandoned properties left behind by earlier successes and departed affluence.

There is no community that doesn’t want to see blight battled. But is restoration what will make that happen? Does the governor’s plan suffer just from opposition to the severance tax in some quarters, or does it also deal with the limitations of its own language?

Restoring Pennsylvania isn’t enough. The Pennsylvania of years past, when the buildings Wolf toured in Greensburg last week were bustling parts of a county seat’s hub, won’t cut it in a 21st century economy.

“Restore Pennsylvania” seems to acknowledge that with other programs, like fixing things that are problems today. Flooding. Broadband access. Neither of those are looking to restore anything. They want to improve and expand.

So why the rear-view mirror in the program name? Why restore Pennsylvania when we could revise it, revisit it, renovate it or reinvent it from the ground up?

Maybe it’s because “Restore Pennsylvania” seems to echo President Trump’s highly resonant “Make America Great Again” slogan. The success of that message in the Keystone State in 2016 swung an election. It speaks to a former glory. It says there is a pedestal the state occupied before and we can sit there again.

But Pennsylvanians would be better served by a call to think bigger than bygone days.

Restoring Pennsylvania doesn’t help achieve the success we need to grow our economy and advance our communities.

To get the new business and increased development that will battle blight, the state’s sales pitch needs to be aspirational, not nostalgic.

And connecting those big ideas to Pennsylvania’s street corners could really resonate.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.