Editorial: Judge is right on Toner Trust | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Judge is right on Toner Trust

The Diocese of Pittsburgh on Feb. 27, 2019.

Robbing Peter to pay Paul is a familiar saying.

It refers to the idea of meeting one obligation at the expense of something else. Pay your light bill by putting off a credit card payment. Buy gas with the grocery money. Use the Christmas savings to take care of the taxes.

It’s usually a shuffle — a way to stretch the resources to get the job done. It doesn’t usually refer to an actual theft.

So that’s why it’s appropriate that Allegheny County Judge Lawrence O’Toole issued an order that stopped the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh from plundering an $8 million trust fund meant to help kids in need.

The Toner Trust was left to the diocese 120 years ago by Westmoreland County farmer and politician James L. Toner. The purpose was to establish an industrial school for boys, and the Toner Institute operated until 1977. Since then, it has been put to work to support diocesan programs that help kids.

But church attorneys went to court in April asking to utilize the money to pay settlements for clergy abuse.

O’Toole was right to say no.

The practice, if not the language, of robbing Peter to pay Paul generally suggests that Peter will receive restitution at some point — that eventually, Paul will be robbed to pay Peter.

Using the Toner Trust to fund settlements with victims of decades of child sexual abuse wouldn’t do that. It would pay a blood debt with a child’s piggy bank. It would compensate those who were assaulted by stealing the programs that would help those in need. It literally and figuratively would loot the poor box.

How do any of the many dioceses who find themselves in this position get out if it isn’t through financial deck-shuffling? Good question. But whether it’s holding a bingo game or opening a lemonade stand, the solution has to be something other than pirating from programs for kids.

The diocese can’t rob today’s children to pay yesterday’s victims. It doesn’t work like that.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.