Editorial: Just what is sustainable? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Just what is sustainable?

1774951_web1_Grant-Ervin
Grant Ervin, Pittsburgh’s chief resiliancy officer, outlines plans for adopting United Nations goals for sustainable development outside the City-County Building on Oct. 4, 2019.

Sustainable is a great new buzzword. It sounds great. Sustainable. It’s hard to argue with the idea of sustainability. Who doesn’t want something to keep going?

The problem is that sustainable can mean two different — and closely related — things with one distinct difference.

Sustainable can mean that something is able to be perpetuated. It can also suggest that it relates to something that will sustain, something that will help keep us moving.

So the question is, which one do people mean when they use it?

Say that a fish is sustainable, and you are talking about it being harvested in a way that is ethically and environmentally clean: no overfishing or illegal practices and nothing that damages other species at the expense of the cash crop.

Say that an energy source is sustainable, and you are probably talking about something like solar or wind, which is replenishable rather than something like oil or gas that is finite.

Is that the kind of thing that Mayor Bill Peduto is talking about as Pittsburgh becomes second only to New York City in adopting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals?

Not specifically.

The list of goals from the U.N. includes things like clean water, clean energy and “responsible consumption,” but more of the 17 goals address the kind of things that are important to most communities: eliminating poverty and hunger, improving health and education, making the world safe for women and those who face discrimination.

It also includes things that can make cities more attractive like economic growth, industry and infrastructure.

There are people who are going to have a natural inclination to embrace this because they agree with some of the principles or with some of the supporters. They might be better served by some healthy questioning.

There are those who will dismiss it the same way. Sustainable means climate change, they may think. Bike Lane Bill wants it so it can’t be right!

People need to stop thinking that facts and solutions and ideas have to line up exclusively with one political ideal or the other, because nothing is ever that easy.

We need communities that have jobs that grow without booming and busting, food that is plentiful without being wasted, homes that are safe and available without feast-or-famine pricing and, yes, environments where our water and air are clean and healthy. To get there, we need to work with each other rather than at odds.

Because all of the opposition just isn’t sustainable.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.