Editorial: Law shouldn’t bend to outrage | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Law shouldn’t bend to outrage

An impromptu press conference Sept. 22 outside the Exxon gas station on Pittsburgh’s North Side. Sharon McIntosh, a member of the Greater Pittsburgh Coalition Against Violence, is speaking.

Outrage is a good catalyst but a poor navigator.

A physical assault on two women at an Exxon station in Pittsburgh’s Marshall- Shadeland neighborhood has prompted huge response.

Viral video of the incident shows the black women leave their car to go into the gas station, ostensibly to ask for a refund after a malfunctioning pump spilled fuel. When they come back into view, they are being hit by men. One woman is dragged to the ground by her hair.

It sparked outcry. It led to protests. Three men were charged with simple assault. That prompted more outcry. Why just misdemeanors for beatings that did look savage, people asked, demanding more serious counts.

Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. declined to change the charges. His office released additional video that showed what happened in a 35-second period inside the gas station, where one of the women appeared to purposely knock over a display of bananas and other items. That was when the assault began.

The gas station has been closed since the uproar began.

People in the community are within their rights to be incensed by the attack. They are free to use their power as a group and as the buying public to express their anger and deny their dollars to a business they don’t believe aligns with their community values. That kind of protest has no threshold beyond what people believe and feel.

Where care must be exercised is when the demands of the people crash into the carefully constructed architecture of the law.

Prosecutors and police must play within the framework that is laid by the legislature, and the people — particularly minority groups — should encourage that. A charge like simple assault has boxes it has to tick off, as does an aggravated assault charge.

One of those boxes should never be public outrage.

The law is meant to be dispassionate because individuals are not. People can ache for a victim and imagine themselves in those shoes.

Blind Lady Justice asks only for facts and returns answers that may leave us frustrated, but punishment should never detour around the laws as they are written. If people are unhappy with laws, there is a process to change them.

A world of social media and instant video makes it easy to react in haste, but the law takes time because it should be more thorough than the quick spark of indignation, even if that righteous fury is justified but especially if it might be mistaken.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.