Editorial: Moon shot proves American aspiration | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Moon shot proves American aspiration

1433465_web1_1417908-3f6e6cfc2a284983a752c0560aea17af

Moon shot.

It was an against-all-odds idea. It was a plan that was as far-fetched as it was impossible. It was the kind of ridiculous idea that you threw out there as an example of ridiculous ideas.

But in 1961, John F. Kennedy gave the impossible a deadline. He stood before a joint session of Congress and said the United States would not just compete in the space race but win it. In less than nine years, we would send a man to the moon and bring him back alive.

It was at once insane and aspirational — a hopeful dream for a hopeless task.

But we did it. With five months to spare, Apollo 11 flew and the Eagle landed. On July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong’s boot left the first footprint on a surface that was no longer out of our reach.

That was 50 years ago. What have we done with that hopeful, insane, aspirational commitment to impossible tasks since then?

Not enough.

Today there may be more technology in a child’s pocket than there was the NASA control room that managed a flight into space to a distant rock. But we spend our time sharpening the tools we already have rather than looking at other problems that are crazy to even dream of solving.

We have challenges that can be met. We have races we can run. We can reach for distant stars.

We have it in our hands to end the very problems that rip us into factions and tear our world into shreds. There is no reason to fight about climate change when we could put a stopwatch on a solution.

“If we could put a man on the moon, we can …”

We could do what? We can do anything. We have shown that limits mean nothing when Americans want to achieve a goal. We speak of American exceptionalism, but the moon landing proved it is nothing compared with American aspiration.

World peace, safer schools, ending addiction, a cure for cancer. Pick a star, and we can shoot for it. We just need a common will to see it done.

But to do that, we need to join hands. We need to decide that regardless of the goal, the prize is succeeding. We didn’t win the space race by trying to sabotage the Soviets. We won it by improving our own program.

Fifty years ago, the unattainable goal was how far we could go.

Today, our moon shot is remembering that we are all in this together.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.