Editorial: Mueller, Rosfeld and what justice looks like | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Mueller, Rosfeld and what justice looks like

931570_web1_WEB-scales-of-justice2

We have a Hollywood fairy-tale idea of justice. It’s something that makes the hurt go away and heals rifts. Maybe sometimes that’s true. It would be nice if it was. But justice doesn’t always look like that.

In Pittsburgh, a significant number of people look at the Michael Rosfeld verdict Friday and don’t see justice. They see a dead black boy and a free white cop and feel an inequity that can’t be expressed. A trial is supposed to deliver justice. How can it leave the mother of a dead child feeling stricken again?

In Washington, two years of investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller culminated Friday with the delivery of his report on allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice by President Trump. On Sunday, Attorney General William Barr released his summary of the report: no collusion, no charges.

While Pittsburgh dealt with protests over the Rosfeld verdict, Washington and cable news shows chewed on the end of the Mueller probe. How could there be no charges? No indictments? But so many other people were charged or pleaded guilty or were found guilty. There has to be more!

But sometimes there isn’t.

Sometimes we have to acknowledge when the race is run, when the fight is fought, when the bell has rung. In both Rosfeld’s trial and Mueller’s investigation, there was a process that had to be followed. There were actions taken to try and establish whether someone had responsibility and whether there would be consequences.

Without a doubt, there were people on both sides of the issues. For every person who mourned Rose, there was someone defending Rosfeld or imagining their police officer husband or brother or son in his position. For everyone demanding answers about Russian interference in the election, there was someone adamant that Trump was not involved.

And that is every trial, every investigation. Whenever there are two sides, there is no answer that will bring us all together. The scales of justice tip based on the weight of the evidence or the opinion of the jury, but they seldom balance in a way that makes both sides say “Yes, that is fair.” Because some things will never feel fair.

Sometimes justice doesn’t look like the answer someone wants. Sometimes justice is just the end of the road.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.