Editorial: No such thing as a free lunch with SNAP | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: No such thing as a free lunch with SNAP

1493542_web1_FoodStamps

Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face. Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Don’t be penny wise and pound foolish.

There are plenty of old sayings that urge us not to do something on principle that makes sense but has an obvious fly in the ointment.

Like the proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program that could take what used to be called food stamps away from 200,000 Pennsylvanians.

The Trump administration proposal would demand that states use federal income threshold and guidelines to obtain the assistance. That means a family of four would have to make $32,000 or less to qualify for SNAP.

Pennsylvania is one of 39 states that makes use of a provision allowing expanded eligibility. A Pennsylvania family of four can make up to $38,000 and qualify.

That could be a real problem, but let’s pull that aspect out of the spotlight, because there is a reason for it, whether people agree with it or not. The government wants to save money. That $6,000 difference in income multiplied across the 3.1 million people nationwide estimated to be affected would add up. The math is undeniable.

That’s the bathwater. So where is the baby?

The baby is a second change that would make recipients who still qualify for SNAP file a separate application for free or reduced-price lunches at school.

Why? One might think it’s not a big deal. It’s an application. Fill it out. You’re getting a free lunch — a little paperwork isn’t too much to ask.

But it’s not the effort of the applicant that’s the issue. It’s the duplication of effort on the state’s side.

The guidelines for free lunches announced in October 2018 say that same family of four can make up to $32,630 and qualify. In other words, if you qualify for SNAP, you would qualify for free lunch, so why should the state be forced to demand, receive and process a separate application?

It’s exactly the kind of unnecessary bureaucratic red-tape mouse trap that defines bad government and poor planning.

You can point out the problem. You can say it doesn’t make sense. But you know the old saying:

You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it think.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.