Editorial: Notre Dame fire shows strength of resurrection | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Notre Dame fire shows strength of resurrection

1030298_web1_AFP_1FO25B

It took more than a hundred years to build. It stood for hundreds more. It defined the skyline of a city and the soul of a religion.

And it didn’t stand a prayer against the consuming hunger of fire.

The vast, awe-inspiring beauty of one of the great palaces of Catholicism was eaten to a cinder like a wooden match when the Cathedral of Notre Dame burned while the world watched on Monday.

That it happened while the cathedral was in the midst of renovation was ironic. That it happened on Holy Monday as Christians mark a solemn week building toward the celebration of Easter compounds the tragedy.

That it happens while governments around the globe — and the Catholic church itself — struggle with upheaval is a way for the great cathedral to once more ring the bell that calls attention and leads the faithful forward.

Because Notre Dame didn’t die. It fell. It can rise again.

The French government has declared the cathedral will be rebuilt. Those defining towers still stand. The foundation is still there. Most important, this is nothing new.

Notre Dame endured the damage of violent religious turmoil in the 16th century. It survived the French Revolution’s blood and terror. It outlasted Nazi occupation.

There may be no better example for the world that there is always a way to resurrect after a tragedy.

It will do what it has done before. It will be evaluated. What is broken? What can be repaired? What must be replaced? What can be salvaged and what should be let go? What is critical to the cathedral’s landmark status and its soulful mission? What can be be improved?

It will not happen overnight. But it will happen. There will come a day when tour guides point to the beautiful structure and say “If you look there, you can see remnants of the fire of 2019.” The destruction will be a detail. The reconstruction will be the reality.

There is no nation — or city or state — on earth that cannot learn from this, including the Vatican.

Our cathedrals are all on fire. We can watch them burn and point fingers, or we can save what can be saved, rebuild what can be rebuilt and make a taller tower that will stand for another few hundred years.

We just have to decide if we want to be the fire that will burn and die or the cathedral that will burn and rise.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.