Editorial: Pa. rape kit progress has to continue | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Pa. rape kit progress has to continue


Imagine being robbed and finding out that, despite reporting it to police and turning over pictures and serial numbers for your TV and your laptop, the report sat on a shelf and waited for an investigation that never happened.

Imagine being shot and discovering that the bullet was in an evidence bag but no one ever examined it.

For years, that was the truth of rape kits in Pennsylvania. Rapes were reported. Kits were collected. And then they just sat.

At its peak, the backlog of untested rape kits in Pennsylvania was more than 3,200 deep, according to Auditor General Eugene DePasquale.

That’s not just boxes on a shelf. It’s not just files in a computer or folders in a cabinet.

That is 3,200 or so people who had a piece of themselves stolen, thousands of people traumatized by a wound hard to overcome, but who still had the strength to report the incident and subject themselves to the new indignity of being scraped and swabbed for the test.

And that is why it is laudable that the state police crime labs and the Philadelphia police forensic unit have been able to whittle that backlog down to just 339 over the course of three years.

What is sad is that 28% of those are in our backyard. The Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office forensic crime lab has 94.

This is not to say that Allegheny County isn’t pulling its weight or treating the rape kits with the respect that the reports deserve. DePasquale acknowledged the progress made, with the county cutting that number from 206 a year ago, and the remaining kits are on track to be tested within months.

But backlogs are only part of the story of rape kits. The backlogs are kits that have sat on those shelves for at least a year. And backlogs exist because of the other crimes that continue to happen, moving older crimes further and further to the back of the line.

That pile of kits that represented years of reported violence and trauma has been bulldozed, but it could easily build back up again if the amount of resources and attention devoted to it after DePasquale uncovered it is allowed to be whittled away.

Pennsylvania has to continue to make processing rape kits a priority, whether there is a horrific backlog of undone work or not.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.