Editorial: Payouts show volume of victims | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Payouts show volume of victims

1826677_web1_gtr-listeningsession1006dk-102318
A woman makes her way into the cathedral before the start of the Diocese of Greensburg listening session on priest abuse at Blessed Sacrament in Greensburg, Oct. 22, 2018.

The Greensburg Catholic Diocese announced Thursday the amount of money paid out of a compensation fund for victims of clergy child sexual abuse.

The local totals came to $4.35 million distributed among 57 adults. That breaks down to an average of $76,315.

That’s a significant amount of money. It’s more than the U.S. Census Bureau pegs the Westmoreland County median household income of $56,702. It’s enough to buy a starter home or put a down payment on something bigger.

But does it heal wounds? Does it buy trust? Does it fix what has been broken?

That’s hard for anyone other than the victims to say, and there are a lot of them out there. The statewide grand jury report released in August 2018 detailed 70 years of abuse by 301 priests.

Greensburg has followed the same track as Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Erie, Scranton, Allentown and Philadelphia with compensation funds administered by consultants to address the cases that fell outside the statute of limitations — the legal line in the sand that says beyond this point, a suit can’t be filed.

So on the one hand, the dioceses did something they didn’t have to do. They stepped up and addressed a problem that could have been dismissed with a shrug.

But we can’t lose sight of the fact that the statute of limitations passed in many cases because of the actions of the church. The grand jury report shows years and years of “secret archives” where reports of predator priests went to languish and die in the dark.

When all of the dioceses’ numbers are tallied and all of the victims added up and all of the money is counted, it is likely to stagger the imagination. The averages for claims in other dioceses range from $114,000 in Harrisburg to $210,000 in Philadelphia. Pittsburgh’s numbers haven’t been released yet.

It can almost make the Greensburg numbers seem like a drop in the bucket. And that’s because they are.

The horror isn’t in the price tag. It is in the volume of victims.

The grand jury report showed how many predators had been documented. The compensation fund numbers show the walking wounded.

The scope of the grand jury report can make the issue seem more distant. Seventy years of abuse? That sounds like history.

But checks in the hands of people who are still alive and dealing with the consequences of abuse shows it as current events.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.