Editorial: Penn Hills can’t depend on state money | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Penn Hills can’t depend on state money

1361250_web1_WEB-cash-in-hand

Good for the taxpayers of Penn Hills.

The highly troubled school district is getting a $3.3 million cash injection from the state on top of the regular annual contribution all districts receive.

State Sen. Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, helped Penn Hills get the extra money from the Department of Education. It follows $4 million in lifelines the state has already thrown the district over the past two years.

And let’s be clear — the ones being rescued are those taxpayers, and they need someone to save them from the district’s alarming mismanagement.

Penn Hills was about to have a 6.69% tax increase. That would have been an additional $144 a year on a house assessed at $75,000. That’s a lot to have tacked on unexpectedly to a bill some already struggle to pay. The district has among the highest millage rates in the region.

It won’t just save money. It will save jobs. Six teachers and a specialist furloughed in June will be brought back, according to board President Erin Vecchio, who called it a “great day for Penn Hills.”

Almost. It’s not a great day. It’s a better day. The school district is still $172 million in debt, about double the annual budget.

Coincidentally, that’s exactly the same as the budget for Kevin Costner’s “Waterworld,” roundly regarded as one of worst expenditures of money in Hollywood history — and that was in 1995.

Penn Hills didn’t spend that money on a post-apocalyptic catastrophe epic. It was spent on an epic construction project that has had catastrophic effects, including a grand jury being called to decide whether carelessness called both “inexcusable” and an “economic ruin” was also criminal.

No charges were filed, but the state has placed the district in “financial recovery status” and appointed Daniel Matsook as chief recovery officer to enact a plan that would right the ship for Penn Hills, where the debt has ballooned as enrollment has dropped.

State money poured into the district’s leaking sieve will help in the short run, but for how long is Costa going to be able to secure that? Plenty of school districts could benefit from that kind of help to overcome problems that weren’t created in-house.

And state money isn’t the state’s money. It’s Pittsburgh and Arnold and Greensburg and Norwin and everyone else’s money, poured into the state coffers. It is right to use it to help, but it can’t be taken for granted.

The taxpayers are surely grateful. But Penn Hills leadership needs to stop depending on the kindness of neighbors.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.